Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change

There is wide scale concern about the effects of red meat on human health and climate change. Plant-based meat alternatives, designed to mimic the sensory experience and nutritional value of red meat, have recently been introduced into consumer markets. Plant-based meats are marketed under the premi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephan van Vliet, Scott L. Kronberg, Frederick D. Provenza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00128/full
id doaj-ec0684b5729746cc9704a2162297db9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec0684b5729746cc9704a2162297db9d2020-11-25T03:37:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems2571-581X2020-10-01410.3389/fsufs.2020.00128555088Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate ChangeStephan van Vliet0Scott L. Kronberg1Frederick D. Provenza2Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United StatesNorthern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Mandan, ND, United StatesDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United StatesThere is wide scale concern about the effects of red meat on human health and climate change. Plant-based meat alternatives, designed to mimic the sensory experience and nutritional value of red meat, have recently been introduced into consumer markets. Plant-based meats are marketed under the premise of environmental and human health benefits and are aimed appeal to a broad consumer base. Meat production is critiqued for its overuse of water supplies, landscape degradation, and greenhouse gas emission, and depending on production practices, environmental footprints may be lower with plant-based meat alternatives. Life-cycle analyses suggest that the novel plant-based meat alternatives have an environmental footprint that may be lower than beef finished in feedlots, but higher than beef raised on well-managed pastures. In this review, we discuss the nutritional and ecological impacts of eating plant-based meat alternatives vs. animal meats. Most humans fall on a spectrum of omnivory: they satisfy some nutrient requirements better from plant foods, while needs for other nutrients are met more readily from animal foods. Animal foods also facilitate the uptake of several plant-derived nutrients (zinc and iron), while plant nutrients can offer protection against potentially harmful compounds in cooked meat. Thus, plant and animal foods operate in symbiotic ways to improve human health. The mimicking of animal foods using isolated plant proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals likely underestimates the true nutritional complexity of whole foods in their natural state, which contain hundreds to thousands of nutrients that impact human health. Novel plant-based meat alternatives should arguably be treated as meat alternatives in terms of sensory experience, but not as true meat replacements in terms of nutrition. If consumers wish to replace some of their meat with plant-based alternatives in the diet (a “flexitarian approach”) this is unlikely to negatively impact their overall nutrient status, but this also depends on what other foods are in their diet and the life stage of the individual.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00128/fullplant-based meatsustainabilitymeatnutritiondietclimate change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephan van Vliet
Scott L. Kronberg
Frederick D. Provenza
spellingShingle Stephan van Vliet
Scott L. Kronberg
Frederick D. Provenza
Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
plant-based meat
sustainability
meat
nutrition
diet
climate change
author_facet Stephan van Vliet
Scott L. Kronberg
Frederick D. Provenza
author_sort Stephan van Vliet
title Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
title_short Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
title_full Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
title_fullStr Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
title_full_unstemmed Plant-Based Meats, Human Health, and Climate Change
title_sort plant-based meats, human health, and climate change
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
issn 2571-581X
publishDate 2020-10-01
description There is wide scale concern about the effects of red meat on human health and climate change. Plant-based meat alternatives, designed to mimic the sensory experience and nutritional value of red meat, have recently been introduced into consumer markets. Plant-based meats are marketed under the premise of environmental and human health benefits and are aimed appeal to a broad consumer base. Meat production is critiqued for its overuse of water supplies, landscape degradation, and greenhouse gas emission, and depending on production practices, environmental footprints may be lower with plant-based meat alternatives. Life-cycle analyses suggest that the novel plant-based meat alternatives have an environmental footprint that may be lower than beef finished in feedlots, but higher than beef raised on well-managed pastures. In this review, we discuss the nutritional and ecological impacts of eating plant-based meat alternatives vs. animal meats. Most humans fall on a spectrum of omnivory: they satisfy some nutrient requirements better from plant foods, while needs for other nutrients are met more readily from animal foods. Animal foods also facilitate the uptake of several plant-derived nutrients (zinc and iron), while plant nutrients can offer protection against potentially harmful compounds in cooked meat. Thus, plant and animal foods operate in symbiotic ways to improve human health. The mimicking of animal foods using isolated plant proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals likely underestimates the true nutritional complexity of whole foods in their natural state, which contain hundreds to thousands of nutrients that impact human health. Novel plant-based meat alternatives should arguably be treated as meat alternatives in terms of sensory experience, but not as true meat replacements in terms of nutrition. If consumers wish to replace some of their meat with plant-based alternatives in the diet (a “flexitarian approach”) this is unlikely to negatively impact their overall nutrient status, but this also depends on what other foods are in their diet and the life stage of the individual.
topic plant-based meat
sustainability
meat
nutrition
diet
climate change
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00128/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanvanvliet plantbasedmeatshumanhealthandclimatechange
AT scottlkronberg plantbasedmeatshumanhealthandclimatechange
AT frederickdprovenza plantbasedmeatshumanhealthandclimatechange
_version_ 1724545062979764224