Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction

The paper articulates mediatization and interaction by approaching and tensioning theoretical perspectives about mediatization as well as the interaction and meaning regimes proposed by sociosemiotics. Thus, it considers that the articulation of the North European and Latin American perspectives of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Ângela Mattos, Conrado Moreira Mendes, Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pontíficia Universidade Católica de São Paulo 2021-04-01
Series:Galáxia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/47917
id doaj-ebfe749f4e0542eca50f48688c63a644
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebfe749f4e0542eca50f48688c63a6442021-07-23T12:34:04ZengPontíficia Universidade Católica de São PauloGaláxia1982-25532021-04-01464630640Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interactionMaria Ângela Mattos0Conrado Moreira Mendes1Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado2Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)The paper articulates mediatization and interaction by approaching and tensioning theoretical perspectives about mediatization as well as the interaction and meaning regimes proposed by sociosemiotics. Thus, it considers that the articulation of the North European and Latin American perspectives of mediatization with the four regimes of interaction and meaning — programming, manipulation, adjustment and accident — present heuristic potential to analyze mediatized interactions. The analysis of these interactions turns to some elements of Jair Bolsonaro’s election campaign for the presidency in 2018, highlighting the fake news operated by bots and the stabbing episode of the candidate. This paper concludes, based on this case, that programming, manipulation and accident tend to be related to the institutionalist perspective of mediatization, centered on the media logic. Manipulation, adjustment and accident tend to be related to the socio-constructivist perspective, inscribed in the logics of mediatization.https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/47917interações midiatizadasjair bolsonaromidiatizaçãoregimes de interação e sentidosociossemiótica.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Ângela Mattos
Conrado Moreira Mendes
Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado
spellingShingle Maria Ângela Mattos
Conrado Moreira Mendes
Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado
Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
Galáxia
interações midiatizadas
jair bolsonaro
midiatização
regimes de interação e sentido
sociossemiótica.
author_facet Maria Ângela Mattos
Conrado Moreira Mendes
Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado
author_sort Maria Ângela Mattos
title Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
title_short Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
title_full Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
title_fullStr Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
title_full_unstemmed Mediatized interactions: Convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
title_sort mediatized interactions: convergences between mediatization and regimes of meaning and interaction
publisher Pontíficia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
series Galáxia
issn 1982-2553
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The paper articulates mediatization and interaction by approaching and tensioning theoretical perspectives about mediatization as well as the interaction and meaning regimes proposed by sociosemiotics. Thus, it considers that the articulation of the North European and Latin American perspectives of mediatization with the four regimes of interaction and meaning — programming, manipulation, adjustment and accident — present heuristic potential to analyze mediatized interactions. The analysis of these interactions turns to some elements of Jair Bolsonaro’s election campaign for the presidency in 2018, highlighting the fake news operated by bots and the stabbing episode of the candidate. This paper concludes, based on this case, that programming, manipulation and accident tend to be related to the institutionalist perspective of mediatization, centered on the media logic. Manipulation, adjustment and accident tend to be related to the socio-constructivist perspective, inscribed in the logics of mediatization.
topic interações midiatizadas
jair bolsonaro
midiatização
regimes de interação e sentido
sociossemiótica.
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/47917
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaangelamattos mediatizedinteractionsconvergencesbetweenmediatizationandregimesofmeaningandinteraction
AT conradomoreiramendes mediatizedinteractionsconvergencesbetweenmediatizationandregimesofmeaningandinteraction
AT tiagobarcelospereirasalgado mediatizedinteractionsconvergencesbetweenmediatizationandregimesofmeaningandinteraction
_version_ 1721290324205109248