Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review
Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has rec...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659/full |
id |
doaj-ebf8115db18a4a7bb20876546fdcbd9e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ebf8115db18a4a7bb20876546fdcbd9e2020-11-25T00:51:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2015-08-01610.3389/fpls.2015.00659155911Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A reviewDylan Patrick Harding0Manish N Raizada1University of GuelphUniversity of GuelphWeeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has received increasingly great attention over the last three decades. Proposed benefits to this strategy include reduced environmental impact, increased target specificity, reduced development costs compared to conventional herbicides, and the identification of novel herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on examples from North America. Among fungi, the prominent genera to receive attention as bioherbicide candidates include Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Among bacteria, Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas share this distinction. The available reports on the application of viruses to controlling weeds are also reviewed. Focus is given to the phytotoxic mechanisms associated with bioherbicide candidates. Achieving consistent suppression of weeds in field conditions is a common challenge to this control strategy, as the efficacy of a bioherbicide candidate is generally more sensitive to environmental variation than a conventional herbicide. Common themes and lessons emerging from the available literature in regard to this challenge are presented. Additionally, future directions for this crop protection strategy are suggested.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659/fullColletotrichumHerbicide ResistancePseudomonasXanthomonasbioherbicidePhoma |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dylan Patrick Harding Manish N Raizada |
spellingShingle |
Dylan Patrick Harding Manish N Raizada Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review Frontiers in Plant Science Colletotrichum Herbicide Resistance Pseudomonas Xanthomonas bioherbicide Phoma |
author_facet |
Dylan Patrick Harding Manish N Raizada |
author_sort |
Dylan Patrick Harding |
title |
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review |
title_short |
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review |
title_full |
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review |
title_fullStr |
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: A review |
title_sort |
controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
issn |
1664-462X |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has received increasingly great attention over the last three decades. Proposed benefits to this strategy include reduced environmental impact, increased target specificity, reduced development costs compared to conventional herbicides, and the identification of novel herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on examples from North America. Among fungi, the prominent genera to receive attention as bioherbicide candidates include Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Among bacteria, Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas share this distinction. The available reports on the application of viruses to controlling weeds are also reviewed. Focus is given to the phytotoxic mechanisms associated with bioherbicide candidates. Achieving consistent suppression of weeds in field conditions is a common challenge to this control strategy, as the efficacy of a bioherbicide candidate is generally more sensitive to environmental variation than a conventional herbicide. Common themes and lessons emerging from the available literature in regard to this challenge are presented. Additionally, future directions for this crop protection strategy are suggested. |
topic |
Colletotrichum Herbicide Resistance Pseudomonas Xanthomonas bioherbicide Phoma |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dylanpatrickharding controllingweedswithfungibacteriaandvirusesareview AT manishnraizada controllingweedswithfungibacteriaandvirusesareview |
_version_ |
1725245445225054208 |