TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Thousands of people whose aggression is thought due to serious mental illness are secluded or restrained every day. Without fair testing these techniques will continue to be used outside of a rigorous evidence base. With such coerciv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferreira Marco AV, Coutinho Evandro SF, Huf Gisele, Ferreira Silvana, Mello Flavia, Adams Clive E
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-07-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/180
id doaj-ebee003e697344639ab009e6e7e2cc29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebee003e697344639ab009e6e7e2cc292020-11-25T00:20:14ZengBMCTrials1745-62152011-07-0112118010.1186/1745-6215-12-180TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialFerreira Marco AVCoutinho Evandro SFHuf GiseleFerreira SilvanaMello FlaviaAdams Clive E<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Thousands of people whose aggression is thought due to serious mental illness are secluded or restrained every day. Without fair testing these techniques will continue to be used outside of a rigorous evidence base. With such coercive treatment this leaves all concerned vulnerable to abuse and criticism. This paper presents the protocol for a randomised trial comparing seclusion with restraints for people with serious mental illnesses.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Setting-General psychiatric wards of a large psychiatric hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Participants-Anyone aggressive or violent suspected or known to have serious mental illness for whom restriction is felt to be indicated by nursing and medical staff, but also for whom they are unsure whether seclusion or restraint would be indicated. Interventions-The standard care of either strong cotton banding to edge of bed with medications as indicated and close observation or the other standard care of use of a minimally furnished seclusion room but with open but barred windows onto the nursing station. Outcomes-time to restrictions lifted, early change of treatment, additional episodes, adverse effects/events, satisfaction with care during episode. Duration-2 weeks. Identifier: ISRCTN 49454276 <url>http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN49454276</url></p> http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/180
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ferreira Marco AV
Coutinho Evandro SF
Huf Gisele
Ferreira Silvana
Mello Flavia
Adams Clive E
spellingShingle Ferreira Marco AV
Coutinho Evandro SF
Huf Gisele
Ferreira Silvana
Mello Flavia
Adams Clive E
TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Trials
author_facet Ferreira Marco AV
Coutinho Evandro SF
Huf Gisele
Ferreira Silvana
Mello Flavia
Adams Clive E
author_sort Ferreira Marco AV
title TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort trec-save: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2011-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Thousands of people whose aggression is thought due to serious mental illness are secluded or restrained every day. Without fair testing these techniques will continue to be used outside of a rigorous evidence base. With such coercive treatment this leaves all concerned vulnerable to abuse and criticism. This paper presents the protocol for a randomised trial comparing seclusion with restraints for people with serious mental illnesses.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Setting-General psychiatric wards of a large psychiatric hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Participants-Anyone aggressive or violent suspected or known to have serious mental illness for whom restriction is felt to be indicated by nursing and medical staff, but also for whom they are unsure whether seclusion or restraint would be indicated. Interventions-The standard care of either strong cotton banding to edge of bed with medications as indicated and close observation or the other standard care of use of a minimally furnished seclusion room but with open but barred windows onto the nursing station. Outcomes-time to restrictions lifted, early change of treatment, additional episodes, adverse effects/events, satisfaction with care during episode. Duration-2 weeks. Identifier: ISRCTN 49454276 <url>http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN49454276</url></p>
url http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/180
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiramarcoav trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coutinhoevandrosf trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hufgisele trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ferreirasilvana trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT melloflavia trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsclivee trecsavearandomisedtrialcomparingmechanicalrestraintswithuseofseclusionforaggressiveorviolentseriouslymentallyillpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725369131371331584