Wild dogma II: The role and implications of wild dogma for wild dog management in Australia
The studies of Allen (2011) and Allen et al. (2011) recently examined the methodology underpinning claims that dingoes provide net benefits to biodiversity by suppressing foxes and cats. They found most studies to have design flaws and/or observational methods that preclude valid interpretations fro...
Main Author: | Benjamin L. ALLEN, Richard M. ENGEMAN, Lee R. ALLEN |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Current Zoology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.currentzoology.org/paperdetail.asp?id=11951 |
Similar Items
-
Wild dogma: An examination of recent “evidence” for dingo regulation of invasive mesopredator release in Australia
by: Benjamin L. ALLEN, Richard M. ENGEMAN, Lee R. ALLEN
Published: (2011-10-01) -
Enough dogma: Seeking the middle ground on the role of dingoes
by: A. S. Glen
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Dingoes at the Doorstep: Home Range Sizes and Activity Patterns of Dingoes and Other Wild Dogs around Urban Areas of North-Eastern Australia
by: Alice T. McNeill, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Demonising the dingo: How much wild dogma is enough?
by: Mike LETNIC, Mathew S. CROWTHER, Christopher R. DICKMAN, Euan RITCHIE
Published: (2011-10-01) -
A Scoping Review of Dingo and Wild-Living Dog Ecology and Biology in Australia to Inform Parameterisation for Disease Spread Modelling
by: Vanessa Gabriele-Rivet, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)