The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer

Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinhua Chen, Yuehong Chen, Yanfeng Hu, Tian Lin, Jun Luo, Tuanjie Li, Tao Li, HuiLin Huang, Yu Zhu, Tingting Li, Hao Chen, Hao Liu, Guoxin Li, Jiang Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
N3b
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/full
id doaj-ebb2be7f3ac94efd932ceea15040ab36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebb2be7f3ac94efd932ceea15040ab362020-11-25T02:39:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-02-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00123496590The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric CancerXinhua ChenYuehong ChenYanfeng HuTian LinJun LuoTuanjie LiTao LiHuiLin HuangYu ZhuTingting LiHao ChenHao LiuGuoxin LiJiang YuBackground: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated.Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs.Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/fullgastric cancerlymph nodeexaminationnode stagingN3b
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xinhua Chen
Yuehong Chen
Yanfeng Hu
Tian Lin
Jun Luo
Tuanjie Li
Tao Li
HuiLin Huang
Yu Zhu
Tingting Li
Hao Chen
Hao Liu
Guoxin Li
Jiang Yu
spellingShingle Xinhua Chen
Yuehong Chen
Yanfeng Hu
Tian Lin
Jun Luo
Tuanjie Li
Tao Li
HuiLin Huang
Yu Zhu
Tingting Li
Hao Chen
Hao Liu
Guoxin Li
Jiang Yu
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
gastric cancer
lymph node
examination
node staging
N3b
author_facet Xinhua Chen
Yuehong Chen
Yanfeng Hu
Tian Lin
Jun Luo
Tuanjie Li
Tao Li
HuiLin Huang
Yu Zhu
Tingting Li
Hao Chen
Hao Liu
Guoxin Li
Jiang Yu
author_sort Xinhua Chen
title The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
title_short The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
title_full The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
title_sort methods of lymph node examination make a difference to node staging and detection of n3b node status for gastric cancer
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated.Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs.Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status.
topic gastric cancer
lymph node
examination
node staging
N3b
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xinhuachen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yuehongchen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yanfenghu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tianlin themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT junluo themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tuanjieli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT taoli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT huilinhuang themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yuzhu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tingtingli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT haochen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT haoliu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT guoxinli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT jiangyu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT xinhuachen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yuehongchen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yanfenghu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tianlin methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT junluo methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tuanjieli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT taoli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT huilinhuang methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT yuzhu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT tingtingli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT haochen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT haoliu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT guoxinli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
AT jiangyu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer
_version_ 1724785394616107008