The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagno...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/full |
id |
doaj-ebb2be7f3ac94efd932ceea15040ab36 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ebb2be7f3ac94efd932ceea15040ab362020-11-25T02:39:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-02-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00123496590The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric CancerXinhua ChenYuehong ChenYanfeng HuTian LinJun LuoTuanjie LiTao LiHuiLin HuangYu ZhuTingting LiHao ChenHao LiuGuoxin LiJiang YuBackground: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated.Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs.Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/fullgastric cancerlymph nodeexaminationnode stagingN3b |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xinhua Chen Yuehong Chen Yanfeng Hu Tian Lin Jun Luo Tuanjie Li Tao Li HuiLin Huang Yu Zhu Tingting Li Hao Chen Hao Liu Guoxin Li Jiang Yu |
spellingShingle |
Xinhua Chen Yuehong Chen Yanfeng Hu Tian Lin Jun Luo Tuanjie Li Tao Li HuiLin Huang Yu Zhu Tingting Li Hao Chen Hao Liu Guoxin Li Jiang Yu The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer Frontiers in Oncology gastric cancer lymph node examination node staging N3b |
author_facet |
Xinhua Chen Yuehong Chen Yanfeng Hu Tian Lin Jun Luo Tuanjie Li Tao Li HuiLin Huang Yu Zhu Tingting Li Hao Chen Hao Liu Guoxin Li Jiang Yu |
author_sort |
Xinhua Chen |
title |
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_short |
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_full |
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr |
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_sort |
methods of lymph node examination make a difference to node staging and detection of n3b node status for gastric cancer |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated.Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs.Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status. |
topic |
gastric cancer lymph node examination node staging N3b |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xinhuachen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yuehongchen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yanfenghu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tianlin themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT junluo themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tuanjieli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT taoli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huilinhuang themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yuzhu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tingtingli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT haochen themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT haoliu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT guoxinli themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT jiangyu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT xinhuachen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yuehongchen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yanfenghu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tianlin methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT junluo methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tuanjieli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT taoli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huilinhuang methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yuzhu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT tingtingli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT haochen methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT haoliu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT guoxinli methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT jiangyu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer |
_version_ |
1724785394616107008 |