Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Abstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norman J. Stomski, Paul Morrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y
id doaj-ebae7b72f3704fcd9a6d899e0aea5916
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebae7b72f3704fcd9a6d899e0aea59162020-11-25T00:40:53ZengBMCInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems1752-44582017-11-0111111110.1186/s13033-017-0174-yParticipation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesisNorman J. Stomski0Paul Morrison1School of Health Professions, Murdoch UniversitySchool of Health Professions, Murdoch UniversityAbstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning of their care. This review synthesizes qualitative research about participation in mental healthcare and articulates essential processes that enable service user participation in mental health care. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed qualitative studies, published between 2000 and 2015, examining participation in mental health care. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to assess the quality of each included study. Constant comparison was used to identify similar constructs across several studies, which were then abstracted into thematic constructs. Results The synthesis resulted in the identification of six principal themes, which articulate key processes that facilitate service user participation in mental healthcare. These themes included: exercising influence; tokenism; sharing knowledge; lacking capacity; respect; and empathy. Conclusions This meta-synthesis demonstrates that service user participation in mental healthcare remains a policy aspiration, which generally has not been translated into clinical practice. The continued lack of impact on policy on the delivery of mental healthcare suggests that change may have to be community driven. Systemic service user advocacy groups could contribute critically to promoting authentic service user participation in the co-production of mental health services.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-yParticipationMental healthMeta-synthesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Norman J. Stomski
Paul Morrison
spellingShingle Norman J. Stomski
Paul Morrison
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Participation
Mental health
Meta-synthesis
author_facet Norman J. Stomski
Paul Morrison
author_sort Norman J. Stomski
title Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
title_short Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
title_sort participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Mental Health Systems
issn 1752-4458
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning of their care. This review synthesizes qualitative research about participation in mental healthcare and articulates essential processes that enable service user participation in mental health care. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed qualitative studies, published between 2000 and 2015, examining participation in mental health care. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to assess the quality of each included study. Constant comparison was used to identify similar constructs across several studies, which were then abstracted into thematic constructs. Results The synthesis resulted in the identification of six principal themes, which articulate key processes that facilitate service user participation in mental healthcare. These themes included: exercising influence; tokenism; sharing knowledge; lacking capacity; respect; and empathy. Conclusions This meta-synthesis demonstrates that service user participation in mental healthcare remains a policy aspiration, which generally has not been translated into clinical practice. The continued lack of impact on policy on the delivery of mental healthcare suggests that change may have to be community driven. Systemic service user advocacy groups could contribute critically to promoting authentic service user participation in the co-production of mental health services.
topic Participation
Mental health
Meta-synthesis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y
work_keys_str_mv AT normanjstomski participationinmentalhealthcareaqualitativemetasynthesis
AT paulmorrison participationinmentalhealthcareaqualitativemetasynthesis
_version_ 1725288209937596416