Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
Abstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Mental Health Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y |
id |
doaj-ebae7b72f3704fcd9a6d899e0aea5916 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ebae7b72f3704fcd9a6d899e0aea59162020-11-25T00:40:53ZengBMCInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems1752-44582017-11-0111111110.1186/s13033-017-0174-yParticipation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesisNorman J. Stomski0Paul Morrison1School of Health Professions, Murdoch UniversitySchool of Health Professions, Murdoch UniversityAbstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning of their care. This review synthesizes qualitative research about participation in mental healthcare and articulates essential processes that enable service user participation in mental health care. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed qualitative studies, published between 2000 and 2015, examining participation in mental health care. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to assess the quality of each included study. Constant comparison was used to identify similar constructs across several studies, which were then abstracted into thematic constructs. Results The synthesis resulted in the identification of six principal themes, which articulate key processes that facilitate service user participation in mental healthcare. These themes included: exercising influence; tokenism; sharing knowledge; lacking capacity; respect; and empathy. Conclusions This meta-synthesis demonstrates that service user participation in mental healthcare remains a policy aspiration, which generally has not been translated into clinical practice. The continued lack of impact on policy on the delivery of mental healthcare suggests that change may have to be community driven. Systemic service user advocacy groups could contribute critically to promoting authentic service user participation in the co-production of mental health services.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-yParticipationMental healthMeta-synthesis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Norman J. Stomski Paul Morrison |
spellingShingle |
Norman J. Stomski Paul Morrison Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis International Journal of Mental Health Systems Participation Mental health Meta-synthesis |
author_facet |
Norman J. Stomski Paul Morrison |
author_sort |
Norman J. Stomski |
title |
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_short |
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_full |
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_fullStr |
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
title_sort |
participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems |
issn |
1752-4458 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Facilitation of service user participation in the co-production of mental healthcare planning and service delivery is an integral component of contemporary mental health policy and clinical guidelines. However, many service users continue to experience exclusion from the planning of their care. This review synthesizes qualitative research about participation in mental healthcare and articulates essential processes that enable service user participation in mental health care. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed qualitative studies, published between 2000 and 2015, examining participation in mental health care. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to assess the quality of each included study. Constant comparison was used to identify similar constructs across several studies, which were then abstracted into thematic constructs. Results The synthesis resulted in the identification of six principal themes, which articulate key processes that facilitate service user participation in mental healthcare. These themes included: exercising influence; tokenism; sharing knowledge; lacking capacity; respect; and empathy. Conclusions This meta-synthesis demonstrates that service user participation in mental healthcare remains a policy aspiration, which generally has not been translated into clinical practice. The continued lack of impact on policy on the delivery of mental healthcare suggests that change may have to be community driven. Systemic service user advocacy groups could contribute critically to promoting authentic service user participation in the co-production of mental health services. |
topic |
Participation Mental health Meta-synthesis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT normanjstomski participationinmentalhealthcareaqualitativemetasynthesis AT paulmorrison participationinmentalhealthcareaqualitativemetasynthesis |
_version_ |
1725288209937596416 |