Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program

Ecologists are increasingly encouraged by funding agencies and professional societies to communicate their research with the public. However, most receive relatively little training in how to do this effectively. Furthermore, evaluation of whether such an investment by ecologists actually achieves c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Cameron, Sarah Yuckin, Erin Bayne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2013-10-01
Series:NeoBiota
Online Access:http://neobiota.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1259
id doaj-eba5f5839e2d42f4809be04516b64fa7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eba5f5839e2d42f4809be04516b64fa72020-11-25T00:49:55ZengPensoft PublishersNeoBiota1619-00331314-24882013-10-01190839710.3897/neobiota.19.48481259Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education programErin CameronSarah YuckinErin BayneEcologists are increasingly encouraged by funding agencies and professional societies to communicate their research with the public. However, most receive relatively little training in how to do this effectively. Furthermore, evaluation of whether such an investment by ecologists actually achieves conservation objectives is rare. We created an education program, involving print, television, radio, and internet media, to increase awareness about earthworm invasions and to discourage anglers from dumping earthworm bait. Using pre- and post-surveys, we evaluated our program’s success in reaching its target audience and in changing knowledge and behavior. Few participants (4.1%) recalled seeing the program material and knowledge of the fact that earthworms are non-native in Alberta remained low (15.8% before, 15.1% after). Further, after being told about the negative effects of earthworms in forests, 46.7% of the anglers surveyed stated they would not change their bait disposal behavior in the future, with many commenting that they did not believe earthworms could be harmful. These results highlight the importance of evaluating education programs, rather than assuming they are successful. Given many participants’ doubts that earthworms have negative effects, both regulations and education may be needed to reduce earthworm introductions.http://neobiota.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1259
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin Cameron
Sarah Yuckin
Erin Bayne
spellingShingle Erin Cameron
Sarah Yuckin
Erin Bayne
Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
NeoBiota
author_facet Erin Cameron
Sarah Yuckin
Erin Bayne
author_sort Erin Cameron
title Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
title_short Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
title_full Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
title_fullStr Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
title_full_unstemmed Communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
title_sort communicating research with the public: evaluation of an invasive earthworm education program
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series NeoBiota
issn 1619-0033
1314-2488
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Ecologists are increasingly encouraged by funding agencies and professional societies to communicate their research with the public. However, most receive relatively little training in how to do this effectively. Furthermore, evaluation of whether such an investment by ecologists actually achieves conservation objectives is rare. We created an education program, involving print, television, radio, and internet media, to increase awareness about earthworm invasions and to discourage anglers from dumping earthworm bait. Using pre- and post-surveys, we evaluated our program’s success in reaching its target audience and in changing knowledge and behavior. Few participants (4.1%) recalled seeing the program material and knowledge of the fact that earthworms are non-native in Alberta remained low (15.8% before, 15.1% after). Further, after being told about the negative effects of earthworms in forests, 46.7% of the anglers surveyed stated they would not change their bait disposal behavior in the future, with many commenting that they did not believe earthworms could be harmful. These results highlight the importance of evaluating education programs, rather than assuming they are successful. Given many participants’ doubts that earthworms have negative effects, both regulations and education may be needed to reduce earthworm introductions.
url http://neobiota.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1259
work_keys_str_mv AT erincameron communicatingresearchwiththepublicevaluationofaninvasiveearthwormeducationprogram
AT sarahyuckin communicatingresearchwiththepublicevaluationofaninvasiveearthwormeducationprogram
AT erinbayne communicatingresearchwiththepublicevaluationofaninvasiveearthwormeducationprogram
_version_ 1725250299026735104