Seismic control for elevated roads

Past earthquakes have demonstrated the vulnerability of deck bridges, which are the most common type in elevated roads. Especially over-loading of piers and drop-off of sections are a continuing concern. Seismic Control concepts, when correctly understood and applied, can provide the necessary physi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dorka Uwe E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Materials and Structures testing of Serbia 2014-01-01
Series:Građevinski Materijali i Konstrukcije
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-8139/2014/0543-07981404009D.pdf
id doaj-eb4de70a8d084312b9bfce5ebf6c5295
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb4de70a8d084312b9bfce5ebf6c52952021-03-23T22:00:46ZengSociety for Materials and Structures testing of SerbiaGrađevinski Materijali i Konstrukcije2217-81392335-02292014-01-0157492010.5937/grmk1404009D0543-07981404009DSeismic control for elevated roadsDorka Uwe E.0Universität Kassel, Kassel, GermanyPast earthquakes have demonstrated the vulnerability of deck bridges, which are the most common type in elevated roads. Especially over-loading of piers and drop-off of sections are a continuing concern. Seismic Control concepts, when correctly understood and applied, can provide the necessary physical force limits and reduced displacements even under loading beyond the design limit. The concept of choice here is the Hysteretic Device System since deck bridges usually provide a natural seismic link between piers and deck. To study the performance and robustness of this concept, shaking table tests were performed at IZIIS, Skopje during the NATO-SfP project ISUbridge on a model deck bridge using controllable friction devices UHYDE-fbr to simulate the behavior of different passive devices including device failure. The tests showed that a stiff-ductile device in the link not only protects the piers from over-load, but also provides superior performance compared to viscous or soft base-isolation devices. Failure of such a device further reduced the demand on the piers but did not lead to excessive deck displacements or damage, thus confirming considerable seismic robustness for the HDS concept. This corroborates observations on the Bolu viaduct during the Kocaeli event. Unfortunately, HDS is often confused with Base- Isolation, which leads to the application of BI-devices, like LRBs and thus a reduction in performance and robustness. This is even more true for viscous devices, which are favored today.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-8139/2014/0543-07981404009D.pdfseismic controlpassive control devicesuhyde-fbrdeck bridgeselevated roadsshaking table testshyde systemseismic robustness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dorka Uwe E.
spellingShingle Dorka Uwe E.
Seismic control for elevated roads
Građevinski Materijali i Konstrukcije
seismic control
passive control devices
uhyde-fbr
deck bridges
elevated roads
shaking table tests
hyde system
seismic robustness
author_facet Dorka Uwe E.
author_sort Dorka Uwe E.
title Seismic control for elevated roads
title_short Seismic control for elevated roads
title_full Seismic control for elevated roads
title_fullStr Seismic control for elevated roads
title_full_unstemmed Seismic control for elevated roads
title_sort seismic control for elevated roads
publisher Society for Materials and Structures testing of Serbia
series Građevinski Materijali i Konstrukcije
issn 2217-8139
2335-0229
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Past earthquakes have demonstrated the vulnerability of deck bridges, which are the most common type in elevated roads. Especially over-loading of piers and drop-off of sections are a continuing concern. Seismic Control concepts, when correctly understood and applied, can provide the necessary physical force limits and reduced displacements even under loading beyond the design limit. The concept of choice here is the Hysteretic Device System since deck bridges usually provide a natural seismic link between piers and deck. To study the performance and robustness of this concept, shaking table tests were performed at IZIIS, Skopje during the NATO-SfP project ISUbridge on a model deck bridge using controllable friction devices UHYDE-fbr to simulate the behavior of different passive devices including device failure. The tests showed that a stiff-ductile device in the link not only protects the piers from over-load, but also provides superior performance compared to viscous or soft base-isolation devices. Failure of such a device further reduced the demand on the piers but did not lead to excessive deck displacements or damage, thus confirming considerable seismic robustness for the HDS concept. This corroborates observations on the Bolu viaduct during the Kocaeli event. Unfortunately, HDS is often confused with Base- Isolation, which leads to the application of BI-devices, like LRBs and thus a reduction in performance and robustness. This is even more true for viscous devices, which are favored today.
topic seismic control
passive control devices
uhyde-fbr
deck bridges
elevated roads
shaking table tests
hyde system
seismic robustness
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-8139/2014/0543-07981404009D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dorkauwee seismiccontrolforelevatedroads
_version_ 1724205689388138496