Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite substantial investment in health capacity building in developing countries, evaluations of capacity building effectiveness are scarce. By analysing projects in Africa that had successfully built sustainable capacity, we aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nhlema-Simwaka Bertha, Ansong Daniel, Squire S Bertel, Taegtmeyer Miriam, Bates Imelda, Baba Amuda, Theobald Sally
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-03-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Online Access:http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/9/1/14
id doaj-eb3f14403279428e9293c04467d26aa4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb3f14403279428e9293c04467d26aa42020-11-25T00:30:19ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052011-03-01911410.1186/1478-4505-9-14Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studiesNhlema-Simwaka BerthaAnsong DanielSquire S BertelTaegtmeyer MiriamBates ImeldaBaba AmudaTheobald Sally<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite substantial investment in health capacity building in developing countries, evaluations of capacity building effectiveness are scarce. By analysing projects in Africa that had successfully built sustainable capacity, we aimed to identify evidence that could indicate that capacity building was likely to be sustainable.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four projects were selected as case studies using pre-determined criteria, including the achievement of sustainable capacity. By mapping the capacity building activities in each case study onto a framework previously used for evaluating health research capacity in Ghana, we were able to identify activities that were common to all projects. We used these activities to derive indicators which could be used in other projects to monitor progress towards building sustainable research capacity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Indicators of sustainable capacity building increased in complexity as projects matured and included</p> <p>- early engagement of stakeholders; explicit plans for scale up; strategies for influencing policies; quality assessments (<it>awareness and experiential stages)</it></p> <p>- improved resources; institutionalisation of activities; innovation <it>(expansion stage)</it></p> <p>- funding for core activities secured; management and decision-making led by southern partners <it>(consolidation stage)</it>.</p> <p>Projects became sustainable after a median of 66 months. The main challenges to achieving sustainability were high turnover of staff and stakeholders, and difficulties in embedding new activities into existing systems, securing funding and influencing policy development.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our indicators of sustainable capacity building need to be tested prospectively in a variety of projects to assess their usefulness. For each project the evidence required to show that indicators have been achieved should evolve with the project and they should be determined prospectively in collaboration with stakeholders.</p> http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/9/1/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nhlema-Simwaka Bertha
Ansong Daniel
Squire S Bertel
Taegtmeyer Miriam
Bates Imelda
Baba Amuda
Theobald Sally
spellingShingle Nhlema-Simwaka Bertha
Ansong Daniel
Squire S Bertel
Taegtmeyer Miriam
Bates Imelda
Baba Amuda
Theobald Sally
Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
Health Research Policy and Systems
author_facet Nhlema-Simwaka Bertha
Ansong Daniel
Squire S Bertel
Taegtmeyer Miriam
Bates Imelda
Baba Amuda
Theobald Sally
author_sort Nhlema-Simwaka Bertha
title Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
title_short Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
title_full Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
title_fullStr Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies
title_sort indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four african case studies
publisher BMC
series Health Research Policy and Systems
issn 1478-4505
publishDate 2011-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite substantial investment in health capacity building in developing countries, evaluations of capacity building effectiveness are scarce. By analysing projects in Africa that had successfully built sustainable capacity, we aimed to identify evidence that could indicate that capacity building was likely to be sustainable.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four projects were selected as case studies using pre-determined criteria, including the achievement of sustainable capacity. By mapping the capacity building activities in each case study onto a framework previously used for evaluating health research capacity in Ghana, we were able to identify activities that were common to all projects. We used these activities to derive indicators which could be used in other projects to monitor progress towards building sustainable research capacity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Indicators of sustainable capacity building increased in complexity as projects matured and included</p> <p>- early engagement of stakeholders; explicit plans for scale up; strategies for influencing policies; quality assessments (<it>awareness and experiential stages)</it></p> <p>- improved resources; institutionalisation of activities; innovation <it>(expansion stage)</it></p> <p>- funding for core activities secured; management and decision-making led by southern partners <it>(consolidation stage)</it>.</p> <p>Projects became sustainable after a median of 66 months. The main challenges to achieving sustainability were high turnover of staff and stakeholders, and difficulties in embedding new activities into existing systems, securing funding and influencing policy development.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our indicators of sustainable capacity building need to be tested prospectively in a variety of projects to assess their usefulness. For each project the evidence required to show that indicators have been achieved should evolve with the project and they should be determined prospectively in collaboration with stakeholders.</p>
url http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/9/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT nhlemasimwakabertha indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT ansongdaniel indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT squiresbertel indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT taegtmeyermiriam indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT batesimelda indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT babaamuda indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
AT theobaldsally indicatorsofsustainablecapacitybuildingforhealthresearchanalysisoffourafricancasestudies
_version_ 1725327322769260544