Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The benefits of marker assisted selection (MAS) are evaluated under realistic assumptions in schemes where the genetic contributions of the candidates to selection are optimised for maximising the rate of genetic progress while restricting the accumulation of inb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pong-Wong Ricardo, Villanueva Beatriz, Woolliams John A
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2002-11-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gsejournal.org/content/34/6/679
id doaj-eb35febad8d246f59984ab1962c2fa63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb35febad8d246f59984ab1962c2fa632020-11-25T00:30:19ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution0999-193X1297-96862002-11-0134667970310.1186/1297-9686-34-6-679Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selectionPong-Wong RicardoVillanueva BeatrizWoolliams John A<p>Abstract</p> <p>The benefits of marker assisted selection (MAS) are evaluated under realistic assumptions in schemes where the genetic contributions of the candidates to selection are optimised for maximising the rate of genetic progress while restricting the accumulation of inbreeding. MAS schemes were compared with schemes where selection is directly on the QTL (GAS or gene assisted selection) and with schemes where genotype information is not considered (PHE or phenotypic selection). A methodology for including prior information on the QTL effect in the genetic evaluation is presented and the benefits from MAS were investigated when prior information was used. The optimisation of the genetic contributions has a great impact on genetic response but the use of markers leads to only moderate extra short-term gains. Optimised PHE did as well as standard truncation GAS (<it>i.e</it>. with fixed contributions) in the short-term and better in the long-term. The maximum accumulated benefit from MAS over PHE was, at the most, half of the maximum benefit achieved from GAS, even with very low recombination rates between the markers and the QTL. However, the use of prior information about the QTL effects can substantially increase genetic gain, and, when the accuracy of the priors is high enough, the responses from MAS are practically as high as those obtained with direct selection on the QTL.</p> http://www.gsejournal.org/content/34/6/679marker assisted selectiongene assisted selectionoptimised selectionBLUP selectionrestricted inbreeding
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pong-Wong Ricardo
Villanueva Beatriz
Woolliams John A
spellingShingle Pong-Wong Ricardo
Villanueva Beatriz
Woolliams John A
Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
Genetics Selection Evolution
marker assisted selection
gene assisted selection
optimised selection
BLUP selection
restricted inbreeding
author_facet Pong-Wong Ricardo
Villanueva Beatriz
Woolliams John A
author_sort Pong-Wong Ricardo
title Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
title_short Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
title_full Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
title_fullStr Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
title_full_unstemmed Marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
title_sort marker assisted selection with optimised contributions of the candidates to selection
publisher BMC
series Genetics Selection Evolution
issn 0999-193X
1297-9686
publishDate 2002-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>The benefits of marker assisted selection (MAS) are evaluated under realistic assumptions in schemes where the genetic contributions of the candidates to selection are optimised for maximising the rate of genetic progress while restricting the accumulation of inbreeding. MAS schemes were compared with schemes where selection is directly on the QTL (GAS or gene assisted selection) and with schemes where genotype information is not considered (PHE or phenotypic selection). A methodology for including prior information on the QTL effect in the genetic evaluation is presented and the benefits from MAS were investigated when prior information was used. The optimisation of the genetic contributions has a great impact on genetic response but the use of markers leads to only moderate extra short-term gains. Optimised PHE did as well as standard truncation GAS (<it>i.e</it>. with fixed contributions) in the short-term and better in the long-term. The maximum accumulated benefit from MAS over PHE was, at the most, half of the maximum benefit achieved from GAS, even with very low recombination rates between the markers and the QTL. However, the use of prior information about the QTL effects can substantially increase genetic gain, and, when the accuracy of the priors is high enough, the responses from MAS are practically as high as those obtained with direct selection on the QTL.</p>
topic marker assisted selection
gene assisted selection
optimised selection
BLUP selection
restricted inbreeding
url http://www.gsejournal.org/content/34/6/679
work_keys_str_mv AT pongwongricardo markerassistedselectionwithoptimisedcontributionsofthecandidatestoselection
AT villanuevabeatriz markerassistedselectionwithoptimisedcontributionsofthecandidatestoselection
AT woolliamsjohna markerassistedselectionwithoptimisedcontributionsofthecandidatestoselection
_version_ 1725327321296011264