Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.

To examine whether National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded articles that were archived in PubMed Central (PMC) after the release of the 2008 NIH Public Access Policy show greater scholarly impact than comparable articles not archived in PMC.A list of journals across several subject areas was deve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra L De Groote, Mary Shultz, Neil R Smalheiser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4598137?pdf=render
id doaj-eb2cd712458b492b93ddc0b0d02390fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb2cd712458b492b93ddc0b0d02390fe2020-11-25T01:44:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011010e013995110.1371/journal.pone.0139951Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.Sandra L De GrooteMary ShultzNeil R SmalheiserTo examine whether National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded articles that were archived in PubMed Central (PMC) after the release of the 2008 NIH Public Access Policy show greater scholarly impact than comparable articles not archived in PMC.A list of journals across several subject areas was developed from which to collect article citation data. Citation information and cited reference counts of the articles published in 2006 and 2009 from 122 journals were obtained from the Scopus database. The articles were separated into categories of NIH funded, non-NIH funded and whether they were deposited in PubMed Central. An analysis of citation data across a five-year timespan was performed on this set of articles.A total of 45,716 articles were examined, including 7,960 with NIH-funding. An analysis of the number of times these articles were cited found that NIH-funded 2006 articles in PMC were not cited significantly more than NIH-funded non-PMC articles. However, 2009 NIH funded articles in PMC were cited 26% more than 2009 NIH funded articles not in PMC, 5 years after publication. This result is highly significant even after controlling for journal (as a proxy of article quality and topic).Our analysis suggests that factors occurring between 2006 and 2009 produced a subsequent boost in scholarly impact of PubMed Central. The 2008 Public Access Policy is likely to be one such factor, but others may have contributed as well (e.g., growing size and visibility of PMC, increasing availability of full-text linkouts from PubMed, and indexing of PMC articles by Google Scholar).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4598137?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandra L De Groote
Mary Shultz
Neil R Smalheiser
spellingShingle Sandra L De Groote
Mary Shultz
Neil R Smalheiser
Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sandra L De Groote
Mary Shultz
Neil R Smalheiser
author_sort Sandra L De Groote
title Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
title_short Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
title_full Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
title_fullStr Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
title_sort examining the impact of the national institutes of health public access policy on the citation rates of journal articles.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To examine whether National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded articles that were archived in PubMed Central (PMC) after the release of the 2008 NIH Public Access Policy show greater scholarly impact than comparable articles not archived in PMC.A list of journals across several subject areas was developed from which to collect article citation data. Citation information and cited reference counts of the articles published in 2006 and 2009 from 122 journals were obtained from the Scopus database. The articles were separated into categories of NIH funded, non-NIH funded and whether they were deposited in PubMed Central. An analysis of citation data across a five-year timespan was performed on this set of articles.A total of 45,716 articles were examined, including 7,960 with NIH-funding. An analysis of the number of times these articles were cited found that NIH-funded 2006 articles in PMC were not cited significantly more than NIH-funded non-PMC articles. However, 2009 NIH funded articles in PMC were cited 26% more than 2009 NIH funded articles not in PMC, 5 years after publication. This result is highly significant even after controlling for journal (as a proxy of article quality and topic).Our analysis suggests that factors occurring between 2006 and 2009 produced a subsequent boost in scholarly impact of PubMed Central. The 2008 Public Access Policy is likely to be one such factor, but others may have contributed as well (e.g., growing size and visibility of PMC, increasing availability of full-text linkouts from PubMed, and indexing of PMC articles by Google Scholar).
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4598137?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraldegroote examiningtheimpactofthenationalinstitutesofhealthpublicaccesspolicyonthecitationratesofjournalarticles
AT maryshultz examiningtheimpactofthenationalinstitutesofhealthpublicaccesspolicyonthecitationratesofjournalarticles
AT neilrsmalheiser examiningtheimpactofthenationalinstitutesofhealthpublicaccesspolicyonthecitationratesofjournalarticles
_version_ 1725027185563009024