Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium

Mapping national political party attitudes towards the EU is crucial in explaining the current state of the EU and is key to understanding political alliances on European affairs. Although important, literature on the topic remains constrained by the idea that positions on European integration can b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clément Jadot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2014-05-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/568/461
id doaj-eb28b6f864aa4e968ff323c8174c6f19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb28b6f864aa4e968ff323c8174c6f192020-11-24T21:30:44ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2014-05-01102248265Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of BelgiumClément Jadot0Université Libre de BruxellesMapping national political party attitudes towards the EU is crucial in explaining the current state of the EU and is key to understanding political alliances on European affairs. Although important, literature on the topic remains constrained by the idea that positions on European integration can be located on a single ‘pro-/anti-axis’. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate why one-dimensional typologies lead to cumbersome and misleading evaluations of party positions. Based on Easton’s theory of political support, the research undertaken hypothesises that such classifications are unable to solve the problem of divergent orientations from one sector to another. Taking Belgium as an example, I explain why Belgian political parties, generally labelled as unanimously ‘pro-integration’, can be considered as divided regarding the EU. The research is primarily based on qualitative analysis of 2009 European manifestos and interviews with party elites conducted from May to July 2010.http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/568/461European integrationPolitical partiesBelgiumMeasurement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clément Jadot
spellingShingle Clément Jadot
Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
Journal of Contemporary European Research
European integration
Political parties
Belgium
Measurement
author_facet Clément Jadot
author_sort Clément Jadot
title Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
title_short Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
title_full Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
title_fullStr Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Do All Roads Lead to the Same Europe? Reconsidering the Pro-/Anti-Integration Yardstick to Measure National Party Positions Towards the EU: The Case of Belgium
title_sort do all roads lead to the same europe? reconsidering the pro-/anti-integration yardstick to measure national party positions towards the eu: the case of belgium
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Mapping national political party attitudes towards the EU is crucial in explaining the current state of the EU and is key to understanding political alliances on European affairs. Although important, literature on the topic remains constrained by the idea that positions on European integration can be located on a single ‘pro-/anti-axis’. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate why one-dimensional typologies lead to cumbersome and misleading evaluations of party positions. Based on Easton’s theory of political support, the research undertaken hypothesises that such classifications are unable to solve the problem of divergent orientations from one sector to another. Taking Belgium as an example, I explain why Belgian political parties, generally labelled as unanimously ‘pro-integration’, can be considered as divided regarding the EU. The research is primarily based on qualitative analysis of 2009 European manifestos and interviews with party elites conducted from May to July 2010.
topic European integration
Political parties
Belgium
Measurement
url http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/568/461
work_keys_str_mv AT clementjadot doallroadsleadtothesameeuropereconsideringtheproantiintegrationyardsticktomeasurenationalpartypositionstowardstheeuthecaseofbelgium
_version_ 1725962026524606464