Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aim...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989 |
id |
doaj-eb16ec4abf2b474fb3ad797df0085a4c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-eb16ec4abf2b474fb3ad797df0085a4c2020-11-25T02:29:19ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012019-08-011616298910.3390/ijerph16162989ijerph16162989Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USAHong Fan0Sheetal Bhurke1Guizhen Jia2Fujian Song3Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, ChinaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC), University of Southampton Beta House, Southampton SO16 7NS, UKNanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, ChinaFaculty of Medicine & Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UKDiabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989non-communicable diseasediabetes mellituscomparative studyChinaUSA |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hong Fan Sheetal Bhurke Guizhen Jia Fujian Song |
spellingShingle |
Hong Fan Sheetal Bhurke Guizhen Jia Fujian Song Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health non-communicable disease diabetes mellitus comparative study China USA |
author_facet |
Hong Fan Sheetal Bhurke Guizhen Jia Fujian Song |
author_sort |
Hong Fan |
title |
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_short |
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_full |
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_fullStr |
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_sort |
differences and similarities in diabetes research between china and the usa |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes. |
topic |
non-communicable disease diabetes mellitus comparative study China USA |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hongfan differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT sheetalbhurke differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT guizhenjia differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT fujiansong differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa |
_version_ |
1724833717871968256 |