Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA

Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong Fan, Sheetal Bhurke, Guizhen Jia, Fujian Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
USA
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989
id doaj-eb16ec4abf2b474fb3ad797df0085a4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb16ec4abf2b474fb3ad797df0085a4c2020-11-25T02:29:19ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012019-08-011616298910.3390/ijerph16162989ijerph16162989Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USAHong Fan0Sheetal Bhurke1Guizhen Jia2Fujian Song3Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, ChinaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC), University of Southampton Beta House, Southampton SO16 7NS, UKNanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, ChinaFaculty of Medicine & Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UKDiabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989non-communicable diseasediabetes mellituscomparative studyChinaUSA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong Fan
Sheetal Bhurke
Guizhen Jia
Fujian Song
spellingShingle Hong Fan
Sheetal Bhurke
Guizhen Jia
Fujian Song
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
non-communicable disease
diabetes mellitus
comparative study
China
USA
author_facet Hong Fan
Sheetal Bhurke
Guizhen Jia
Fujian Song
author_sort Hong Fan
title Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
title_short Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
title_full Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
title_fullStr Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
title_full_unstemmed Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
title_sort differences and similarities in diabetes research between china and the usa
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes.
topic non-communicable disease
diabetes mellitus
comparative study
China
USA
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2989
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfan differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa
AT sheetalbhurke differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa
AT guizhenjia differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa
AT fujiansong differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa
_version_ 1724833717871968256