Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility

Mathematical formulations of two-phase flows at an aerator remain a challenging issue for spillway design. Due to their complexities in terms of water–air interactions subjected to high flow velocities, experiments play an essential role in evaluations of numerical models. The paper focuses on the u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Yang, Penghua Teng, Hongwei Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1552201
id doaj-eb10654d43684710a6698d77f1154f30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb10654d43684710a6698d77f1154f302020-11-25T02:01:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics1994-20601997-003X2019-01-01131486610.1080/19942060.2018.15522011552201Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facilityJames Yang0Penghua Teng1Hongwei Zhang2Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR)Mathematical formulations of two-phase flows at an aerator remain a challenging issue for spillway design. Due to their complexities in terms of water–air interactions subjected to high flow velocities, experiments play an essential role in evaluations of numerical models. The paper focuses on the underlying influence of the air–water momentum exchange in the two-phase Two-Fluid Model. It is modified to better represent the drag force acting on a group of air bubbles and the wall lubrication force accounting for near-wall phase interactions. Based on data from a large aerator rig with an approach velocity of 14.3 m/s, the models are evaluated for calculations of entrained air characteristics of a flow mixture. The air bubble diameter used in the modeling ranges from 0.5 to 4 mm as suggested by the experiments. In terms of air cavity configurations and aerator air demand, smaller air bubbles lead to better agreement with the test results. As far as air concentrations are concerned, the modified model gains by comparison. In the air cavity zone, smaller bubble sizes also provide better matches with the experiments. However, the near-base air concentration remains overestimated downstream from the impact area. The fact that the program user must pre-define a single air bubble size in simulations presumably limits the correct reproduction of near-base air concentrations and of their decay.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1552201aeratortwo-phase flowtwo-fluid modeldrag forcewall lubrication forceair cavity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Yang
Penghua Teng
Hongwei Zhang
spellingShingle James Yang
Penghua Teng
Hongwei Zhang
Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
aerator
two-phase flow
two-fluid model
drag force
wall lubrication force
air cavity
author_facet James Yang
Penghua Teng
Hongwei Zhang
author_sort James Yang
title Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
title_short Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
title_full Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
title_fullStr Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
title_full_unstemmed Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
title_sort experiments and cfd modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
issn 1994-2060
1997-003X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Mathematical formulations of two-phase flows at an aerator remain a challenging issue for spillway design. Due to their complexities in terms of water–air interactions subjected to high flow velocities, experiments play an essential role in evaluations of numerical models. The paper focuses on the underlying influence of the air–water momentum exchange in the two-phase Two-Fluid Model. It is modified to better represent the drag force acting on a group of air bubbles and the wall lubrication force accounting for near-wall phase interactions. Based on data from a large aerator rig with an approach velocity of 14.3 m/s, the models are evaluated for calculations of entrained air characteristics of a flow mixture. The air bubble diameter used in the modeling ranges from 0.5 to 4 mm as suggested by the experiments. In terms of air cavity configurations and aerator air demand, smaller air bubbles lead to better agreement with the test results. As far as air concentrations are concerned, the modified model gains by comparison. In the air cavity zone, smaller bubble sizes also provide better matches with the experiments. However, the near-base air concentration remains overestimated downstream from the impact area. The fact that the program user must pre-define a single air bubble size in simulations presumably limits the correct reproduction of near-base air concentrations and of their decay.
topic aerator
two-phase flow
two-fluid model
drag force
wall lubrication force
air cavity
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1552201
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesyang experimentsandcfdmodelingofhighvelocitytwophaseflowsinalargechuteaeratorfacility
AT penghuateng experimentsandcfdmodelingofhighvelocitytwophaseflowsinalargechuteaeratorfacility
AT hongweizhang experimentsandcfdmodelingofhighvelocitytwophaseflowsinalargechuteaeratorfacility
_version_ 1724956337544101888