EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO

The Constitutional Court Ruling 31/2010, of 28 June has authenticated the limitations and possibilities for the development of a constitutional model of justice that inevitably has to adapt to the reality of a politically decentralized State. The Ruling has therefore taken a reading that consolidate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José M.ª Porras Ramírez
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern 2011-03-01
Series:Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Porras_tcm112-146944.pdf
id doaj-eb0a787dc211467e8f480522c7529bd7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb0a787dc211467e8f480522c7529bd72021-03-02T08:15:07ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322011-03-0112331362EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELOJosé M.ª Porras RamírezJosé M.ª Porras RamírezThe Constitutional Court Ruling 31/2010, of 28 June has authenticated the limitations and possibilities for the development of a constitutional model of justice that inevitably has to adapt to the reality of a politically decentralized State. The Ruling has therefore taken a reading that consolidates the validity of the most regressive principles of that model, failing to take the opportunity that was offered to require the legislator to exhaust the possibilities for achieving a perfect articulation of the principles of jurisdictional unity and political autonomy, as a preparatory condition for desirable constitutional reform. However, despite the Ruling, those possibilities still exist, encouraged by the federal dynamic of the State itself, which demands their continual exploration. The Statute is therefore built on the regulatory programme of deferred compliance over time, which signals the path it needs to take, and that path has to follow channels that are necessarily federal.http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Porras_tcm112-146944.pdfConstitutionStatute of AutonomyOrganic Law of Judicial Powerfederalism
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José M.ª Porras Ramírez
José M.ª Porras Ramírez
spellingShingle José M.ª Porras Ramírez
José M.ª Porras Ramírez
EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Constitution
Statute of Autonomy
Organic Law of Judicial Power
federalism
author_facet José M.ª Porras Ramírez
José M.ª Porras Ramírez
author_sort José M.ª Porras Ramírez
title EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
title_short EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
title_full EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
title_fullStr EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
title_full_unstemmed EL PODER JUDICIAL EN CATALUÑA, SEGÚN EL ESTATUT Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LIMITACIONES Y POSIBILIDADES DE DESARROLLO DE UN MODELO
title_sort el poder judicial en cataluña, según el estatut y el tribunal constitucional. limitaciones y posibilidades de desarrollo de un modelo
publisher Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
series Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
issn 1886-2632
publishDate 2011-03-01
description The Constitutional Court Ruling 31/2010, of 28 June has authenticated the limitations and possibilities for the development of a constitutional model of justice that inevitably has to adapt to the reality of a politically decentralized State. The Ruling has therefore taken a reading that consolidates the validity of the most regressive principles of that model, failing to take the opportunity that was offered to require the legislator to exhaust the possibilities for achieving a perfect articulation of the principles of jurisdictional unity and political autonomy, as a preparatory condition for desirable constitutional reform. However, despite the Ruling, those possibilities still exist, encouraged by the federal dynamic of the State itself, which demands their continual exploration. The Statute is therefore built on the regulatory programme of deferred compliance over time, which signals the path it needs to take, and that path has to follow channels that are necessarily federal.
topic Constitution
Statute of Autonomy
Organic Law of Judicial Power
federalism
url http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Porras_tcm112-146944.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT josemaporrasramirez elpoderjudicialencatalunasegunelestatutyeltribunalconstitucionallimitacionesyposibilidadesdedesarrollodeunmodelo
AT josemaporrasramirez elpoderjudicialencatalunasegunelestatutyeltribunalconstitucionallimitacionesyposibilidadesdedesarrollodeunmodelo
_version_ 1724240790693085184