Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation

This study sought to establish the conceptual relationship between intrinsic religiosity and spirituality by evaluating their capacity to mediate one another. Analysis was done using a cross-sectional data provided by university students (N = 333) from the Limpopo Province, South Africa. SEM analysi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Mashegoane, M. Makhubela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2016-12-01
Series:Theologia Viatorum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://theologiaviatorum.org/index.php/tv/article/view/12
id doaj-eb098fca8f344936875d0ae1271e0645
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb098fca8f344936875d0ae1271e06452020-11-25T03:52:34ZengAOSISTheologia Viatorum0378-41422664-29802016-12-0140212814410.4102/tv.v40i2.126Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediationS. Mashegoane0M. Makhubela1University of LimpopoUniversity of PretoriaThis study sought to establish the conceptual relationship between intrinsic religiosity and spirituality by evaluating their capacity to mediate one another. Analysis was done using a cross-sectional data provided by university students (N = 333) from the Limpopo Province, South Africa. SEM analysis was used to test two hypothesised mediation models: 1) in which intrinsic religiosity was hypothesized to influence health risk behaviours in paths mediated by spirituality (religious well-being and existential well-being), and 2) in which spirituality (religious well-being and existential wellbeing) was hypothesized to influence health risk behaviours in paths mediated by intrinsic religiosity. Intrinsic religiosity failed to mediate the association between health risk behaviours and spirituality, and spirituality also failed to mediate the association between intrinsic religiosity and health risk behaviours. Nevertheless, there were direct relations between the religiosity/spirituality variables and most of the health risk behaviours measured in this study. Results showed that intrinsic religiosity and spirituality dimensions are independent constructs in this particular sample, since they failed to mediate each other. Our results support the putative bifurcation of the two constructs in the literature and findings of distinct independent roles they have on health.https://theologiaviatorum.org/index.php/tv/article/view/12intrinsic religiosityspiritualitymediationhealth risk behaviours
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Mashegoane
M. Makhubela
spellingShingle S. Mashegoane
M. Makhubela
Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
Theologia Viatorum
intrinsic religiosity
spirituality
mediation
health risk behaviours
author_facet S. Mashegoane
M. Makhubela
author_sort S. Mashegoane
title Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
title_short Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
title_full Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
title_fullStr Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
title_full_unstemmed Examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
title_sort examining religiosity and spirituality concepts and their protective role in health risk behaviour: testing for mutual mediation
publisher AOSIS
series Theologia Viatorum
issn 0378-4142
2664-2980
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This study sought to establish the conceptual relationship between intrinsic religiosity and spirituality by evaluating their capacity to mediate one another. Analysis was done using a cross-sectional data provided by university students (N = 333) from the Limpopo Province, South Africa. SEM analysis was used to test two hypothesised mediation models: 1) in which intrinsic religiosity was hypothesized to influence health risk behaviours in paths mediated by spirituality (religious well-being and existential well-being), and 2) in which spirituality (religious well-being and existential wellbeing) was hypothesized to influence health risk behaviours in paths mediated by intrinsic religiosity. Intrinsic religiosity failed to mediate the association between health risk behaviours and spirituality, and spirituality also failed to mediate the association between intrinsic religiosity and health risk behaviours. Nevertheless, there were direct relations between the religiosity/spirituality variables and most of the health risk behaviours measured in this study. Results showed that intrinsic religiosity and spirituality dimensions are independent constructs in this particular sample, since they failed to mediate each other. Our results support the putative bifurcation of the two constructs in the literature and findings of distinct independent roles they have on health.
topic intrinsic religiosity
spirituality
mediation
health risk behaviours
url https://theologiaviatorum.org/index.php/tv/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT smashegoane examiningreligiosityandspiritualityconceptsandtheirprotectiveroleinhealthriskbehaviourtestingformutualmediation
AT mmakhubela examiningreligiosityandspiritualityconceptsandtheirprotectiveroleinhealthriskbehaviourtestingformutualmediation
_version_ 1724482086622986240