Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties

Background: Rural populations are diagnosed with cancer at different rate and stages than nonrural populations, and race/ethnicity as well as the area-level income exacerbates the differences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore cancer screening rates across persistent poverty rural counties...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin J. Bennett PhD, Chaiporn Pumkam MHA, Jessica D. Bellinger PhD, Janice C. Probst PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-10-01
Series:Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131911406123
id doaj-eadd37db01ae4f55b26554e512a80551
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eadd37db01ae4f55b26554e512a805512020-11-25T03:51:58ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Primary Care & Community Health2150-13192150-13272011-10-01210.1177/2150131911406123Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural CountiesKevin J. Bennett PhD0Chaiporn Pumkam MHA1Jessica D. Bellinger PhD2Janice C. Probst PhD3Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USADepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USADepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USADepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USABackground: Rural populations are diagnosed with cancer at different rate and stages than nonrural populations, and race/ethnicity as well as the area-level income exacerbates the differences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore cancer screening rates across persistent poverty rural counties, with emphasis on nonwhite populations. Methods: The 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System was used, combined with data from the Area Resource File (analytic n = 309 937 unweighted, 196 344 347 weighted). Unadjusted analysis estimated screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Multivariate analysis estimated the odds of screening, controlling for individual and county-level effects. Results: Rural residents, particularly those in persistent poverty counties, were less likely to be screened than urban residents. More African Americans in persistent poverty rural counties reported not having mammography screening (18.3%) compared to 15.9% of urban African Americans. Hispanics had low screening rates across all service types. Multivariate analysis continued to find disparities in screening rates, after controlling for individual and county-level factors. African Americans in persistent poverty rural counties were more likely to be screened for both breast cancer (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.85) and cervical cancer (1.46; 1.07-1.99) when compared with urban whites. Conclusions: Disparities in cancer screening rates exist across not only race/ethnicity but also county type. These disparities cannot be fully explained by either individual or county-level effects. Programs have been successful in improving screening rates for African American women and should be expanded to target other vulnerable women as well as other services such as colorectal cancer screening.https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131911406123
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin J. Bennett PhD
Chaiporn Pumkam MHA
Jessica D. Bellinger PhD
Janice C. Probst PhD
spellingShingle Kevin J. Bennett PhD
Chaiporn Pumkam MHA
Jessica D. Bellinger PhD
Janice C. Probst PhD
Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
author_facet Kevin J. Bennett PhD
Chaiporn Pumkam MHA
Jessica D. Bellinger PhD
Janice C. Probst PhD
author_sort Kevin J. Bennett PhD
title Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
title_short Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
title_full Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
title_fullStr Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Screening Delivery in Persistent Poverty Rural Counties
title_sort cancer screening delivery in persistent poverty rural counties
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
issn 2150-1319
2150-1327
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Background: Rural populations are diagnosed with cancer at different rate and stages than nonrural populations, and race/ethnicity as well as the area-level income exacerbates the differences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore cancer screening rates across persistent poverty rural counties, with emphasis on nonwhite populations. Methods: The 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System was used, combined with data from the Area Resource File (analytic n = 309 937 unweighted, 196 344 347 weighted). Unadjusted analysis estimated screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Multivariate analysis estimated the odds of screening, controlling for individual and county-level effects. Results: Rural residents, particularly those in persistent poverty counties, were less likely to be screened than urban residents. More African Americans in persistent poverty rural counties reported not having mammography screening (18.3%) compared to 15.9% of urban African Americans. Hispanics had low screening rates across all service types. Multivariate analysis continued to find disparities in screening rates, after controlling for individual and county-level factors. African Americans in persistent poverty rural counties were more likely to be screened for both breast cancer (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.85) and cervical cancer (1.46; 1.07-1.99) when compared with urban whites. Conclusions: Disparities in cancer screening rates exist across not only race/ethnicity but also county type. These disparities cannot be fully explained by either individual or county-level effects. Programs have been successful in improving screening rates for African American women and should be expanded to target other vulnerable women as well as other services such as colorectal cancer screening.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131911406123
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinjbennettphd cancerscreeningdeliveryinpersistentpovertyruralcounties
AT chaipornpumkammha cancerscreeningdeliveryinpersistentpovertyruralcounties
AT jessicadbellingerphd cancerscreeningdeliveryinpersistentpovertyruralcounties
AT janicecprobstphd cancerscreeningdeliveryinpersistentpovertyruralcounties
_version_ 1724485145143017472