Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The gap between research and practice limits utilization of relevant, progressive and empirically validated strategies in substance abuse treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants included substance abuse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McCarty Dennis, Saedi Goal, Fuller Bret E, Rieckmann Traci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-03-01
Series:Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Online Access:http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/4
id doaj-eadcad6fabdf4aab8ff786aca7db206e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eadcad6fabdf4aab8ff786aca7db206e2020-11-25T00:16:10ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2010-03-0151410.1186/1747-597X-5-4Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatmentMcCarty DennisSaedi GoalFuller Bret ERieckmann Traci<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The gap between research and practice limits utilization of relevant, progressive and empirically validated strategies in substance abuse treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants included substance abuse treatment programs from the Northeastern United States. Structural equation models were constructed with agency level data to explore two outcome variables: adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools at two points in time; models also included organizational, staffing and service variables.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In 1997, managed care involvement and provision of primary care services had the strongest association with increased use of assessment tools, which, along with provision of counseling services, were associated with a greater use of practice guidelines. In 2001, managed care involvement, counseling services and being a stand-alone drug treatment agency were associated with a greater use of assessment tools, which was in turn related to an increase in the use of practice guidelines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study provides managers, clinicians and policy-makers with a framework for understanding factors related to the adoption of new technologies in substance abuse treatment.</p> http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author McCarty Dennis
Saedi Goal
Fuller Bret E
Rieckmann Traci
spellingShingle McCarty Dennis
Saedi Goal
Fuller Bret E
Rieckmann Traci
Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
author_facet McCarty Dennis
Saedi Goal
Fuller Bret E
Rieckmann Traci
author_sort McCarty Dennis
title Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
title_short Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
title_full Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
title_fullStr Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
title_sort adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools in substance abuse treatment
publisher BMC
series Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
issn 1747-597X
publishDate 2010-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The gap between research and practice limits utilization of relevant, progressive and empirically validated strategies in substance abuse treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants included substance abuse treatment programs from the Northeastern United States. Structural equation models were constructed with agency level data to explore two outcome variables: adoption of practice guidelines and assessment tools at two points in time; models also included organizational, staffing and service variables.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In 1997, managed care involvement and provision of primary care services had the strongest association with increased use of assessment tools, which, along with provision of counseling services, were associated with a greater use of practice guidelines. In 2001, managed care involvement, counseling services and being a stand-alone drug treatment agency were associated with a greater use of assessment tools, which was in turn related to an increase in the use of practice guidelines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study provides managers, clinicians and policy-makers with a framework for understanding factors related to the adoption of new technologies in substance abuse treatment.</p>
url http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT mccartydennis adoptionofpracticeguidelinesandassessmenttoolsinsubstanceabusetreatment
AT saedigoal adoptionofpracticeguidelinesandassessmenttoolsinsubstanceabusetreatment
AT fullerbrete adoptionofpracticeguidelinesandassessmenttoolsinsubstanceabusetreatment
AT rieckmanntraci adoptionofpracticeguidelinesandassessmenttoolsinsubstanceabusetreatment
_version_ 1725384164181540864