Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development

Over the last few decades the Internet, World Wide Web, cyberspace and so forth have emerged as crucial cultural and political arenas, and thus of increasing relevance as objects and areas of ethnographic inquiry. The paper argues that the ethnographical entry-point for studying such technologically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Casper Bruun Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-04-01
Series:Methodological Innovations
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0011
id doaj-ead47b28ad5c40a9b4460ba15f9656af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ead47b28ad5c40a9b4460ba15f9656af2020-11-25T03:52:34ZengSAGE PublishingMethodological Innovations2059-79912010-04-01510.4256/mio.2010.0011Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for DevelopmentCasper Bruun JensenOver the last few decades the Internet, World Wide Web, cyberspace and so forth have emerged as crucial cultural and political arenas, and thus of increasing relevance as objects and areas of ethnographic inquiry. The paper argues that the ethnographical entry-point for studying such technologically mediated arenas creates specific effects of ‘path-dependence ‘and attendant asymmetries of knowledge. Globally distributed networks of organizations, collaborating on issues relating to information- and communication technologies for development (ICT4Dev) provides context for the argument. Three sources of knowledge asymmetries are identified: limited presence , partial information and uncertain connections . Athough mediated ethnographies invariably create asymmetries of knowledge they also thrive on these asymmetries. This is because they also replicate features of the field itself: asymmetries of knowledge likewise characterize and influence the activities of globally distributed networks. In conjunction, the three sources of asymmetry create a predicament of mutual opacity as a condition of knowledge making in ICT4Dev networks as well as for the ethnographer. Focusing on the consequences of these asymmetries, the paper argues that mediated ethnography has central contributions to make in a) analyzing the specific formats of the social that emerges from globally distributed organizations and networks and b) bringing to light some alternative stories about what might be done with ICT4Dev.https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0011
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Casper Bruun Jensen
spellingShingle Casper Bruun Jensen
Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
Methodological Innovations
author_facet Casper Bruun Jensen
author_sort Casper Bruun Jensen
title Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
title_short Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
title_full Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
title_fullStr Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetries of Knowledge: Mediated Ethnography and ICT for Development
title_sort asymmetries of knowledge: mediated ethnography and ict for development
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Methodological Innovations
issn 2059-7991
publishDate 2010-04-01
description Over the last few decades the Internet, World Wide Web, cyberspace and so forth have emerged as crucial cultural and political arenas, and thus of increasing relevance as objects and areas of ethnographic inquiry. The paper argues that the ethnographical entry-point for studying such technologically mediated arenas creates specific effects of ‘path-dependence ‘and attendant asymmetries of knowledge. Globally distributed networks of organizations, collaborating on issues relating to information- and communication technologies for development (ICT4Dev) provides context for the argument. Three sources of knowledge asymmetries are identified: limited presence , partial information and uncertain connections . Athough mediated ethnographies invariably create asymmetries of knowledge they also thrive on these asymmetries. This is because they also replicate features of the field itself: asymmetries of knowledge likewise characterize and influence the activities of globally distributed networks. In conjunction, the three sources of asymmetry create a predicament of mutual opacity as a condition of knowledge making in ICT4Dev networks as well as for the ethnographer. Focusing on the consequences of these asymmetries, the paper argues that mediated ethnography has central contributions to make in a) analyzing the specific formats of the social that emerges from globally distributed organizations and networks and b) bringing to light some alternative stories about what might be done with ICT4Dev.
url https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0011
work_keys_str_mv AT casperbruunjensen asymmetriesofknowledgemediatedethnographyandictfordevelopment
_version_ 1724482086183632896