Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment

The main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinaya Manchaiah, Berth Danermark, Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Otolaryngology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684
id doaj-ead0a13c1e884554806b0dd9449feb4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ead0a13c1e884554806b0dd9449feb4f2020-11-24T23:22:42ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/168684168684Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing ImpairmentVinaya Manchaiah0Berth Danermark1Jerker Rönnberg2Thomas Lunner3Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UKThe Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, SwedenLinnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Science and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenLinnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Science and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenThe main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” and some specific examples are provided from studies on patient journey of persons with hearing impairment (PHI) and their communication partners (CPs). In addition, methodological aspects in process evaluation are discussed in relation to various metatheoretical perspectives. The discussion has been supplemented with relevant literature. The healthcare practice and disability research in general are dominated by the use of outcome measures. Even though the values of outcome measures are not questioned, there seems to be a little focus on understanding the process of change over time in relation to health and disability. We suggest that the process evaluation has an additional temporal dimension and has applications in both clinical practice and research in relation to health and disability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vinaya Manchaiah
Berth Danermark
Jerker Rönnberg
Thomas Lunner
spellingShingle Vinaya Manchaiah
Berth Danermark
Jerker Rönnberg
Thomas Lunner
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
International Journal of Otolaryngology
author_facet Vinaya Manchaiah
Berth Danermark
Jerker Rönnberg
Thomas Lunner
author_sort Vinaya Manchaiah
title Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
title_short Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
title_full Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
title_fullStr Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
title_full_unstemmed Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
title_sort importance of “process evaluation” in audiological rehabilitation: examples from studies on hearing impairment
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Otolaryngology
issn 1687-9201
1687-921X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” and some specific examples are provided from studies on patient journey of persons with hearing impairment (PHI) and their communication partners (CPs). In addition, methodological aspects in process evaluation are discussed in relation to various metatheoretical perspectives. The discussion has been supplemented with relevant literature. The healthcare practice and disability research in general are dominated by the use of outcome measures. Even though the values of outcome measures are not questioned, there seems to be a little focus on understanding the process of change over time in relation to health and disability. We suggest that the process evaluation has an additional temporal dimension and has applications in both clinical practice and research in relation to health and disability.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684
work_keys_str_mv AT vinayamanchaiah importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment
AT berthdanermark importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment
AT jerkerronnberg importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment
AT thomaslunner importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment
_version_ 1725566798892367872