Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment
The main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” an...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Otolaryngology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684 |
id |
doaj-ead0a13c1e884554806b0dd9449feb4f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ead0a13c1e884554806b0dd9449feb4f2020-11-24T23:22:42ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/168684168684Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing ImpairmentVinaya Manchaiah0Berth Danermark1Jerker Rönnberg2Thomas Lunner3Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UKThe Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, SwedenLinnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Science and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenLinnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Science and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenThe main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” and some specific examples are provided from studies on patient journey of persons with hearing impairment (PHI) and their communication partners (CPs). In addition, methodological aspects in process evaluation are discussed in relation to various metatheoretical perspectives. The discussion has been supplemented with relevant literature. The healthcare practice and disability research in general are dominated by the use of outcome measures. Even though the values of outcome measures are not questioned, there seems to be a little focus on understanding the process of change over time in relation to health and disability. We suggest that the process evaluation has an additional temporal dimension and has applications in both clinical practice and research in relation to health and disability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vinaya Manchaiah Berth Danermark Jerker Rönnberg Thomas Lunner |
spellingShingle |
Vinaya Manchaiah Berth Danermark Jerker Rönnberg Thomas Lunner Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment International Journal of Otolaryngology |
author_facet |
Vinaya Manchaiah Berth Danermark Jerker Rönnberg Thomas Lunner |
author_sort |
Vinaya Manchaiah |
title |
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment |
title_short |
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment |
title_full |
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment |
title_fullStr |
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment |
title_sort |
importance of “process evaluation” in audiological rehabilitation: examples from studies on hearing impairment |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Otolaryngology |
issn |
1687-9201 1687-921X |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The main focus of this paper is to discuss the importance of “evaluating the process of change” (i.e., process evaluation) in people with disability by studying their lived experiences. Detailed discussion is made about “why and how to investigate the process of change in people with disability?” and some specific examples are provided from studies on patient journey of persons with hearing impairment (PHI) and their communication partners (CPs). In addition, methodological aspects in process evaluation are discussed in relation to various metatheoretical perspectives. The discussion has been supplemented with relevant literature. The healthcare practice and disability research in general are dominated by the use of outcome measures. Even though the values of outcome measures are not questioned, there seems to be a little focus on understanding the process of change over time in relation to health and disability. We suggest that the process evaluation has an additional temporal dimension and has applications in both clinical practice and research in relation to health and disability. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vinayamanchaiah importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment AT berthdanermark importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment AT jerkerronnberg importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment AT thomaslunner importanceofprocessevaluationinaudiologicalrehabilitationexamplesfromstudiesonhearingimpairment |
_version_ |
1725566798892367872 |