Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands

Main-stream evaluations of failed policies are geared towards finding a limited set of factors that are deemed to have caused the problem. This is particularly so in the case of high-profile public projects such as in technology and infrastructure development. While justified from the point of polit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Marks, Lasse Gerrits
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bamberg Press 2017-01-01
Series:Complexity, Governance & Networks
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/42
id doaj-eab937b58ff64c2fa0265dff1bfd52be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eab937b58ff64c2fa0265dff1bfd52be2020-11-25T02:16:13ZengUniversity of Bamberg PressComplexity, Governance & Networks2214-29912214-30092017-01-0101486210.20377/cgn-4239Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the NetherlandsPeter Marks0Lasse Gerrits1Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University RotterdamChair for the Governance of Innovative and Complex Technological Systems, Otto-Friedrich-Universität BambergMain-stream evaluations of failed policies are geared towards finding a limited set of factors that are deemed to have caused the problem. This is particularly so in the case of high-profile public projects such as in technology and infrastructure development. While justified from the point of political accountability, this article presents an alternative view. Following insights from evolutionary economics and complex systems about the embedded nature of technological systems and the role of chance next to purposeful planning, we demonstrate that traditional policy evaluations are misguided when geared towards simplistic cause-and-effect relations. To this end, we analyze the reasons for the mixed results in the Dutch high-speed railway case. The findings show that, contrary to popular opinions in the political domain, technological progress did take place. However, misalignment between social practices and technological systems masked that progress.https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/42innovation policycomplexity sciencesocio-technological innovationpolicy evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Marks
Lasse Gerrits
spellingShingle Peter Marks
Lasse Gerrits
Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
Complexity, Governance & Networks
innovation policy
complexity science
socio-technological innovation
policy evaluation
author_facet Peter Marks
Lasse Gerrits
author_sort Peter Marks
title Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
title_short Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
title_full Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands
title_sort evaluating technological progress in public policies: the case of the high-speed railways in the netherlands
publisher University of Bamberg Press
series Complexity, Governance & Networks
issn 2214-2991
2214-3009
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Main-stream evaluations of failed policies are geared towards finding a limited set of factors that are deemed to have caused the problem. This is particularly so in the case of high-profile public projects such as in technology and infrastructure development. While justified from the point of political accountability, this article presents an alternative view. Following insights from evolutionary economics and complex systems about the embedded nature of technological systems and the role of chance next to purposeful planning, we demonstrate that traditional policy evaluations are misguided when geared towards simplistic cause-and-effect relations. To this end, we analyze the reasons for the mixed results in the Dutch high-speed railway case. The findings show that, contrary to popular opinions in the political domain, technological progress did take place. However, misalignment between social practices and technological systems masked that progress.
topic innovation policy
complexity science
socio-technological innovation
policy evaluation
url https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/42
work_keys_str_mv AT petermarks evaluatingtechnologicalprogressinpublicpoliciesthecaseofthehighspeedrailwaysinthenetherlands
AT lassegerrits evaluatingtechnologicalprogressinpublicpoliciesthecaseofthehighspeedrailwaysinthenetherlands
_version_ 1724891909789319168