Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations

A detailed assessment of the “gate-to-gate” social risks and benefits of Canadian egg production facilities was undertaken based on the United Nations Environment Programme/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathan Pelletier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1601
id doaj-eaa5a1f19e3d478dab12bb2e798c2b4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eaa5a1f19e3d478dab12bb2e798c2b4d2020-11-24T22:25:31ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-05-01105160110.3390/su10051601su10051601Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and RecommendationsNathan Pelletier0Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)/Egg Farmers of Canada (EFC) Industrial Research Chair in Sustainability, Department of Biology/Faculty of Management, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, CanadaA detailed assessment of the “gate-to-gate” social risks and benefits of Canadian egg production facilities was undertaken based on the United Nations Environment Programme/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment. Data were collected via survey from a representative subset of Canadian egg farms, and evaluated against a novel suite of indicators and performance reference points developed for relevance in the Canadian context. The evaluation focused on interactions with four stakeholder groups (Workers; Local Communities; Value Chain Partners; and Society) in eighteen thematic areas. This assessment resulted in a rich and highly nuanced characterization of the potential social risks and benefits attributable to contemporary egg production facilities in Canada. Overall, risks were low and benefits were identified for Local Communities, Value Chain Partners, and Society stakeholder groups, but mixed for the Workers stakeholder group. With respect to the latter, identified areas of higher risk are related, in particular, to a subset of indicators for Working Hours, Equal Opportunities and Fair Salary. As such, the results suggest opportunities and strategies for the Canadian egg industry both to capitalize on its current successes as well as to proactively engage in improving its social sustainability profile. The study also contributes a novel set of social sustainability metrics for use and continued development in the Canadian egg sector as well as other agri-food sectors in Canada and beyond. The inevitable challenge in social life cycle assessment (LCA) of developing non-arbitrary performance reference points for social indicators for which clear norms do not exist, and similarly for establishing non-arbitrary scales and thresholds for differentiating between performance levels, is underscored. A necessary next step with respect to the methods presented herein is for stakeholder groups to carefully consider and refine the performance reference points and characterization thresholds that have been developed, in order to assess their alignment with context-specific social sustainability priorities for this industry, and also to extend the analysis to encompass other value chain stages to enable a full social life cycle assessment.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1601social life cycle assessmentsocial impact assessment methodssocial sustainabilityeggsCanada
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan Pelletier
spellingShingle Nathan Pelletier
Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
Sustainability
social life cycle assessment
social impact assessment methods
social sustainability
eggs
Canada
author_facet Nathan Pelletier
author_sort Nathan Pelletier
title Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
title_short Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
title_full Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
title_fullStr Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Social Sustainability Assessment of Canadian Egg Production Facilities: Methods, Analysis, and Recommendations
title_sort social sustainability assessment of canadian egg production facilities: methods, analysis, and recommendations
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-05-01
description A detailed assessment of the “gate-to-gate” social risks and benefits of Canadian egg production facilities was undertaken based on the United Nations Environment Programme/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment. Data were collected via survey from a representative subset of Canadian egg farms, and evaluated against a novel suite of indicators and performance reference points developed for relevance in the Canadian context. The evaluation focused on interactions with four stakeholder groups (Workers; Local Communities; Value Chain Partners; and Society) in eighteen thematic areas. This assessment resulted in a rich and highly nuanced characterization of the potential social risks and benefits attributable to contemporary egg production facilities in Canada. Overall, risks were low and benefits were identified for Local Communities, Value Chain Partners, and Society stakeholder groups, but mixed for the Workers stakeholder group. With respect to the latter, identified areas of higher risk are related, in particular, to a subset of indicators for Working Hours, Equal Opportunities and Fair Salary. As such, the results suggest opportunities and strategies for the Canadian egg industry both to capitalize on its current successes as well as to proactively engage in improving its social sustainability profile. The study also contributes a novel set of social sustainability metrics for use and continued development in the Canadian egg sector as well as other agri-food sectors in Canada and beyond. The inevitable challenge in social life cycle assessment (LCA) of developing non-arbitrary performance reference points for social indicators for which clear norms do not exist, and similarly for establishing non-arbitrary scales and thresholds for differentiating between performance levels, is underscored. A necessary next step with respect to the methods presented herein is for stakeholder groups to carefully consider and refine the performance reference points and characterization thresholds that have been developed, in order to assess their alignment with context-specific social sustainability priorities for this industry, and also to extend the analysis to encompass other value chain stages to enable a full social life cycle assessment.
topic social life cycle assessment
social impact assessment methods
social sustainability
eggs
Canada
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1601
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanpelletier socialsustainabilityassessmentofcanadianeggproductionfacilitiesmethodsanalysisandrecommendations
_version_ 1725757058959015936