Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Estimation of plasma cell infiltrates in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is a standard method in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM). Plasma cell fraction in the bone marrow is therefore cri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lučin Ksenija, Načinović Antica, Štemberger Christophe, Seili-Bekafigo Irena, Valković Toni, Babarović Emina, Štifter Sanja, Jonjić Nives
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-05-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/30
id doaj-ea9f6b8c460c4fa29a6bf0f75ed26adc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea9f6b8c460c4fa29a6bf0f75ed26adc2020-11-24T22:01:02ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962010-05-01513010.1186/1746-1596-5-30Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myelomaLučin KsenijaNačinović AnticaŠtemberger ChristopheSeili-Bekafigo IrenaValković ToniBabarović EminaŠtifter SanjaJonjić Nives<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Estimation of plasma cell infiltrates in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is a standard method in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM). Plasma cell fraction in the bone marrow is therefore critical for the classification and optimal clinical management of patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. The aim of the study was to compare the percentage of plasma cells obtained by both methods with the patient clinical parameters and survival.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This retrospective study included BMA and BMB of 59 MM patients. The conventional differential count was determined in BMA to estimate the percentage and cytologic grade of plasma cells. The pattern of neoplastic infiltration and percentage of plasma cells were estimated on CD138 immunostained BMB slides microscopically and by computer-assisted image analysis (CIA).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significantly higher values of plasma cell infiltrates were observed in pathologist (47.7 ± 24.8) and CIA (44.1 ± 30.6) reports in comparison with cytologist analysis (30.6 ± 17.1; <it>P </it>< 0.001 and <it>P </it>< 0.0048, respectively). BMB assessment by pathologist counting and using CIA showed strongest correlation (r = 0.8; <it>P </it>< 0.0001). Correlation was also observed between the pathologist and cytologist counts (r = 0.321; <it>P </it>= 0.015) as well as comparing the percentage of plasma cells in BMA and CIA (r = 0.27; <it>P </it>= 0.05). Patients with clinical stage I/II had a significantly lower CIA plasma cell count than those with clinical stage III (<it>P </it>= 0.008). Overall survival was shorter in patients with more than 25% of atypical plasma cell morphology estimated in BMA (<it>P </it>= 0.05) and a higher percentage of tumor cell infiltrates estimated by the pathologist and CIA (<it>P </it>= 0.0341 and <it>P </it>= 0.013, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Study results suggested the combined analyses to be useful as a routine procedure to achieve more accurate and informative diagnostic data.</p> http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/30
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lučin Ksenija
Načinović Antica
Štemberger Christophe
Seili-Bekafigo Irena
Valković Toni
Babarović Emina
Štifter Sanja
Jonjić Nives
spellingShingle Lučin Ksenija
Načinović Antica
Štemberger Christophe
Seili-Bekafigo Irena
Valković Toni
Babarović Emina
Štifter Sanja
Jonjić Nives
Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
Diagnostic Pathology
author_facet Lučin Ksenija
Načinović Antica
Štemberger Christophe
Seili-Bekafigo Irena
Valković Toni
Babarović Emina
Štifter Sanja
Jonjić Nives
author_sort Lučin Ksenija
title Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
title_short Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
title_full Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
title_sort combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma
publisher BMC
series Diagnostic Pathology
issn 1746-1596
publishDate 2010-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Estimation of plasma cell infiltrates in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is a standard method in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM). Plasma cell fraction in the bone marrow is therefore critical for the classification and optimal clinical management of patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. The aim of the study was to compare the percentage of plasma cells obtained by both methods with the patient clinical parameters and survival.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This retrospective study included BMA and BMB of 59 MM patients. The conventional differential count was determined in BMA to estimate the percentage and cytologic grade of plasma cells. The pattern of neoplastic infiltration and percentage of plasma cells were estimated on CD138 immunostained BMB slides microscopically and by computer-assisted image analysis (CIA).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significantly higher values of plasma cell infiltrates were observed in pathologist (47.7 ± 24.8) and CIA (44.1 ± 30.6) reports in comparison with cytologist analysis (30.6 ± 17.1; <it>P </it>< 0.001 and <it>P </it>< 0.0048, respectively). BMB assessment by pathologist counting and using CIA showed strongest correlation (r = 0.8; <it>P </it>< 0.0001). Correlation was also observed between the pathologist and cytologist counts (r = 0.321; <it>P </it>= 0.015) as well as comparing the percentage of plasma cells in BMA and CIA (r = 0.27; <it>P </it>= 0.05). Patients with clinical stage I/II had a significantly lower CIA plasma cell count than those with clinical stage III (<it>P </it>= 0.008). Overall survival was shorter in patients with more than 25% of atypical plasma cell morphology estimated in BMA (<it>P </it>= 0.05) and a higher percentage of tumor cell infiltrates estimated by the pathologist and CIA (<it>P </it>= 0.0341 and <it>P </it>= 0.013, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Study results suggested the combined analyses to be useful as a routine procedure to achieve more accurate and informative diagnostic data.</p>
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/30
work_keys_str_mv AT lucinksenija combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT nacinovicantica combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT stembergerchristophe combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT seilibekafigoirena combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT valkovictoni combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT babarovicemina combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT stiftersanja combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
AT jonjicnives combinedevaluationofbonemarrowaspirateandbiopsyissuperiorintheprognosisofmultiplemyeloma
_version_ 1725842070671720448