Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology

In this article, we study do-it-yourself (DIY) biology, by looking in particular at the different forms of valuation within the DIY biology movement. Building upon recent work in economic sociology and the study of valuation, we take as case studies different projects developed by DIY biologists. O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morgan Meyer, Rebecca Wilbanks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2020-03-01
Series:Valuation Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/309
id doaj-ea9d0ef64f8d42f2bd3584880f083082
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea9d0ef64f8d42f2bd3584880f0830822020-11-25T01:15:20ZengLinköping University Electronic PressValuation Studies2001-59922020-03-017110.3384/VS.2001-5992.2020.7.1.101Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY BiologyMorgan Meyer0Rebecca Wilbanks1MinesParisTechJohns Hopkins University In this article, we study do-it-yourself (DIY) biology, by looking in particular at the different forms of valuation within the DIY biology movement. Building upon recent work in economic sociology and the study of valuation, we take as case studies different projects developed by DIY biologists. Our approach is attentive to the moments when these projects are valued, i.e. during competitions, investment pitches, and crowdfunding campaigns. The projects analyzed involve both market valuations (with investments, products and potential markets) and non-market valuations (be they social, ethical or cultural). Our key argument is that value is produced through distributed and heterogeneous processes: products, practices, principles and places are valued at the same time. We show that there is not only a valuation of technical and production aspects (well highlighted in the key literature on valuation), but also a valuation of social links and of specific forms of organization. Both are inseparable - it is neither the object nor the context in themselves that are valued, but the “good-within-the-context-of-its-making”: the production of vegan cheese or biological ink and the places and communities of DIY biology or future markets are valued. The valuation practices we examine aim at producing an interest in a threefold sense: a general interest (a public good), an interest for the public (its curiosity), and a monetary interest (by making people financially participate).  https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/309DIY biologybiological inkvegan cheesemoments of valuationnon-market valuation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morgan Meyer
Rebecca Wilbanks
spellingShingle Morgan Meyer
Rebecca Wilbanks
Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
Valuation Studies
DIY biology
biological ink
vegan cheese
moments of valuation
non-market valuation
author_facet Morgan Meyer
Rebecca Wilbanks
author_sort Morgan Meyer
title Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
title_short Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
title_full Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
title_fullStr Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
title_full_unstemmed Valuating Practices, Principles and Products in DIY Biology
title_sort valuating practices, principles and products in diy biology
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Valuation Studies
issn 2001-5992
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In this article, we study do-it-yourself (DIY) biology, by looking in particular at the different forms of valuation within the DIY biology movement. Building upon recent work in economic sociology and the study of valuation, we take as case studies different projects developed by DIY biologists. Our approach is attentive to the moments when these projects are valued, i.e. during competitions, investment pitches, and crowdfunding campaigns. The projects analyzed involve both market valuations (with investments, products and potential markets) and non-market valuations (be they social, ethical or cultural). Our key argument is that value is produced through distributed and heterogeneous processes: products, practices, principles and places are valued at the same time. We show that there is not only a valuation of technical and production aspects (well highlighted in the key literature on valuation), but also a valuation of social links and of specific forms of organization. Both are inseparable - it is neither the object nor the context in themselves that are valued, but the “good-within-the-context-of-its-making”: the production of vegan cheese or biological ink and the places and communities of DIY biology or future markets are valued. The valuation practices we examine aim at producing an interest in a threefold sense: a general interest (a public good), an interest for the public (its curiosity), and a monetary interest (by making people financially participate). 
topic DIY biology
biological ink
vegan cheese
moments of valuation
non-market valuation
url https://valuationstudies.liu.se/article/view/309
work_keys_str_mv AT morganmeyer valuatingpracticesprinciplesandproductsindiybiology
AT rebeccawilbanks valuatingpracticesprinciplesandproductsindiybiology
_version_ 1725153822293098496