Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China

Abstract Subtropical reservoirs are an important source of atmospheric methane (CH4). This study investigated the spatiotemporal variability of bubble and diffusive CH4 emissions from a subtropical reservoir, including its upstream and downstream rivers, in eastern China. There was no obvious season...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Le Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2019-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44470-2
id doaj-ea8e7aa65d824659b68fcde4c32f9049
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea8e7aa65d824659b68fcde4c32f90492020-12-08T08:34:04ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222019-05-019111010.1038/s41598-019-44470-2Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern ChinaLe Yang0Zhejiang Academy of ForestryAbstract Subtropical reservoirs are an important source of atmospheric methane (CH4). This study investigated the spatiotemporal variability of bubble and diffusive CH4 emissions from a subtropical reservoir, including its upstream and downstream rivers, in eastern China. There was no obvious seasonal variation in CH4 emissions from the main reservoir, which increased slightly from the first half year to the next half year. In the upstream river, CH4 emissions were low from February to June and fluctuated widely from July to January due to bubble activity. In the downstream river, CH4 emissions were lowest in February, which was possibly influenced by the low streamflow rate from the reservoir (275 m3 s−1) and a short period of mixing. There was spatial variability in CH4 emissions, where fluxes were highest from the upstream river (3.65 ± 3.24 mg CH4 m−2 h−1) and lowest from the main reservoir (0.082 ± 0.061 mg CH4 m−2 h−1), and emissions from the downstream river were 0.49 ± 0.20 mg CH4 m−2 h−1. Inflow rivers are hot spots in bubble CH4 emissions that should be examined using field-sampling strategies. This study will improve the accuracy of current and future estimations of CH4 emissions from hydroelectric systems and will help guide mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44470-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Le Yang
spellingShingle Le Yang
Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
Scientific Reports
author_facet Le Yang
author_sort Le Yang
title Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
title_short Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
title_full Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
title_fullStr Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern China
title_sort contrasting methane emissions from upstream and downstream rivers and their associated subtropical reservoir in eastern china
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Subtropical reservoirs are an important source of atmospheric methane (CH4). This study investigated the spatiotemporal variability of bubble and diffusive CH4 emissions from a subtropical reservoir, including its upstream and downstream rivers, in eastern China. There was no obvious seasonal variation in CH4 emissions from the main reservoir, which increased slightly from the first half year to the next half year. In the upstream river, CH4 emissions were low from February to June and fluctuated widely from July to January due to bubble activity. In the downstream river, CH4 emissions were lowest in February, which was possibly influenced by the low streamflow rate from the reservoir (275 m3 s−1) and a short period of mixing. There was spatial variability in CH4 emissions, where fluxes were highest from the upstream river (3.65 ± 3.24 mg CH4 m−2 h−1) and lowest from the main reservoir (0.082 ± 0.061 mg CH4 m−2 h−1), and emissions from the downstream river were 0.49 ± 0.20 mg CH4 m−2 h−1. Inflow rivers are hot spots in bubble CH4 emissions that should be examined using field-sampling strategies. This study will improve the accuracy of current and future estimations of CH4 emissions from hydroelectric systems and will help guide mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44470-2
work_keys_str_mv AT leyang contrastingmethaneemissionsfromupstreamanddownstreamriversandtheirassociatedsubtropicalreservoirineasternchina
_version_ 1724391013208817664