Norway and Its Obligations under ILO 169—Some Considerations after the Recent Stjernøy Supreme Court Case
Main Author: | Øyvind Ravna |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Arctic Review on Law and Politics |
Online Access: | https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/583/1159 |
Similar Items
-
A Sámi Community Wins Case against the Swedish State in the Supreme Court
by: Øyvind Ravna
Published: (2020-02-01) -
The draft amendment to the “Fisheries Law” and the ILO Convention 169. Reflections on a Judgment of the Chilean Constitutional Court
by: Claudio Troncoso Repetto
Published: (2013-12-01) -
No Going Back. The Impact of ILO Convention 169 on Latin America in Comparative Perspective
by: Jose Aylwin, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
The ‘New Jungle Law’: Development, Indigenous Rights and ILO Convention 169 in Latin America
by: Peter Bille Larsen
Published: (2017-10-01) -
Norwegian Courts and Sámi Law
by: Øyvind Ravna
Published: (2021-09-01)