Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression

<div>Can the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empirically</div><div>as capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one singl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denis Ribeaud, Manuel Eisner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bielefeld 2010-12-01
Series:International Journal of Conflict and Violence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/92
id doaj-ea7ce029220c495dbddd38a45aa84b31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea7ce029220c495dbddd38a45aa84b312020-11-25T00:41:48ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-12-0142298315Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of AggressionDenis RibeaudManuel Eisner<div>Can the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empirically</div><div>as capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one single scale of Moral Neutralization? First, we show how the different approaches overlap conceptually. Second, in Study 1, we verify that four scales derived from the three conceptions of Moral Neutralization are correlated in such a way that they can be conceived as measuring the same phenomenon. Third, building on the results of Study 1, we derive a unified scale of Moral Neutralization which specifically focuses on the neutralization of aggression and test it in a large general population sample of preadolescents (Study 2). Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a good internal consistency and acceptable cross-gender factorial invariance. Correlation analyses with related behavioral and cognitive constructs corroborate the scale’s criterion and convergent validity. In the final section we present a possible integration of Moral Neutralization in a broader framework of crime causation.</div>http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/92SCALE, NEUTRALIZATION TECHNIQUES, MORAL DISENGAGEMENT, SELF-SERVING COGNITIVE DISTORSIONS, MORAL NEUTRALIZATION, SITUATIONAL ACTION THEORY
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
spellingShingle Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
SCALE, NEUTRALIZATION TECHNIQUES, MORAL DISENGAGEMENT, SELF-SERVING COGNITIVE DISTORSIONS, MORAL NEUTRALIZATION, SITUATIONAL ACTION THEORY
author_facet Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
author_sort Denis Ribeaud
title Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_short Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_full Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_fullStr Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_full_unstemmed Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_sort are moral disengagement, neutralization techniques, and self-serving cognitive distortions the same? developing a unified scale of moral neutralization of aggression
publisher University of Bielefeld
series International Journal of Conflict and Violence
issn 1864-1385
publishDate 2010-12-01
description <div>Can the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empirically</div><div>as capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one single scale of Moral Neutralization? First, we show how the different approaches overlap conceptually. Second, in Study 1, we verify that four scales derived from the three conceptions of Moral Neutralization are correlated in such a way that they can be conceived as measuring the same phenomenon. Third, building on the results of Study 1, we derive a unified scale of Moral Neutralization which specifically focuses on the neutralization of aggression and test it in a large general population sample of preadolescents (Study 2). Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a good internal consistency and acceptable cross-gender factorial invariance. Correlation analyses with related behavioral and cognitive constructs corroborate the scale’s criterion and convergent validity. In the final section we present a possible integration of Moral Neutralization in a broader framework of crime causation.</div>
topic SCALE, NEUTRALIZATION TECHNIQUES, MORAL DISENGAGEMENT, SELF-SERVING COGNITIVE DISTORSIONS, MORAL NEUTRALIZATION, SITUATIONAL ACTION THEORY
url http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/92
work_keys_str_mv AT denisribeaud aremoraldisengagementneutralizationtechniquesandselfservingcognitivedistortionsthesamedevelopingaunifiedscaleofmoralneutralizationofaggression
AT manueleisner aremoraldisengagementneutralizationtechniquesandselfservingcognitivedistortionsthesamedevelopingaunifiedscaleofmoralneutralizationofaggression
_version_ 1725285482533748736