Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
Main Authors: | Romain Jouffroy, Benoît Vivien |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Critical Care |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0 |
Similar Items
-
Positive cultures and clinical outcomes in septic patients: be aware of the influence from patient selection and the in-hospital confounders
by: Romain Jouffroy, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Implementation of earlier antibiotic administration in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan: antibiotic action needs time and tissue perfusion to reach target
by: Romain Jouffroy, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Yuting Li, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study
by: June-sung Kim, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: faster is better for severe patients
by: Romain Jouffroy, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)