Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity

Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romain Jouffroy, Benoît Vivien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Critical Care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0
id doaj-ea745905accb4470a54e03993717dcce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea745905accb4470a54e03993717dcce2021-08-15T11:04:01ZengBMCCritical Care1364-85352021-08-012511210.1186/s13054-021-03651-0Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivityRomain Jouffroy0Benoît Vivien1Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris and Paris Saclay UniversitySAMU de Paris, Service d’Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker - Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and Paris Universityhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Romain Jouffroy
Benoît Vivien
spellingShingle Romain Jouffroy
Benoît Vivien
Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
Critical Care
author_facet Romain Jouffroy
Benoît Vivien
author_sort Romain Jouffroy
title Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_short Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_full Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_fullStr Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_sort comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
publisher BMC
series Critical Care
issn 1364-8535
publishDate 2021-08-01
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0
work_keys_str_mv AT romainjouffroy comparisonofculturenegativeandculturepositivesepsisorsepticshockoutcomesaremoreinfluencedbythenatureoftheinfectiousagentitselfthanbythesamplespositivity
AT benoitvivien comparisonofculturenegativeandculturepositivesepsisorsepticshockoutcomesaremoreinfluencedbythenatureoftheinfectiousagentitselfthanbythesamplespositivity
_version_ 1721207256412848128

Similar Items