Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula

Abstract Background Global health is the study, research, and practice of medicine focused on improving health and achieving health equity for all persons worldwide. International and national bodies stipulate that global health be integrated into medical school curricula. However, there is a global...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: InciSioN UK Collaborative
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02315-x
id doaj-ea70fdfb8b494e4a955222c0036b28c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea70fdfb8b494e4a955222c0036b28c52020-11-25T04:00:46ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-10-0120111710.1186/s12909-020-02315-xGlobal health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curriculaInciSioN UK Collaborative0Medical Sciences Division, University of OxfordAbstract Background Global health is the study, research, and practice of medicine focused on improving health and achieving health equity for all persons worldwide. International and national bodies stipulate that global health be integrated into medical school curricula. However, there is a global paucity of data evaluating the state of global health teaching in medical schools. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of global health teaching activities at United Kingdom (UK) medical schools. Methods A national, cross-sectional study assessing all timetabled teachings sessions within UK medical courses for global health content during the academic year 2018/19. Global health content was evaluated against a comprehensive list of global health learning outcomes for medical students. Results Data from 39 medical courses representing 86% (30/36) of eligible medical schools was collected. Typically, medical courses reported timetabled teaching covering over three-quarters of all global health learning outcomes. However, a wide degree of variation existed among granular global health learning objectives covered within the different medical courses. On average, each learning outcome had a 79% [95% CI: 73, 83%] probability of being included in course curricula. There were a number of learning outcomes that had a lower probability, such as ‘access to surgeons with the necessary skills and equipment in different countries’ (36%) [95% CI: 21, 53%], ‘future impact of climate change on health and healthcare systems’ (67%) [95% CI: 50, 81%], and ‘role of the WHO’ (54%) [95% CI: 28, 60%]. Conclusions This study served as the first national assessment of global health education and curricula within UK medical schools. Through a formalised assessment of teaching events produced by medical schools around the country, we were able to capture a national picture of global health education, including the strengths of global health prioritisation in the UK, as well as areas for improvement. Overall, it appears broad-level global health themes are widely discussed; however, the granularities of key, emerging areas of concern are omitted by curricula. In particular, gaps persist relating to international healthcare systems, multilateral global health agencies such as the WHO, global surgery, climate change and more.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02315-xGlobal healthMedical educationMedical schoolCollaborativeCurriculaDiversity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author InciSioN UK Collaborative
spellingShingle InciSioN UK Collaborative
Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
BMC Medical Education
Global health
Medical education
Medical school
Collaborative
Curricula
Diversity
author_facet InciSioN UK Collaborative
author_sort InciSioN UK Collaborative
title Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
title_short Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
title_full Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
title_fullStr Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
title_full_unstemmed Global health education in medical schools (GHEMS): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
title_sort global health education in medical schools (ghems): a national, collaborative study of medical curricula
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Background Global health is the study, research, and practice of medicine focused on improving health and achieving health equity for all persons worldwide. International and national bodies stipulate that global health be integrated into medical school curricula. However, there is a global paucity of data evaluating the state of global health teaching in medical schools. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of global health teaching activities at United Kingdom (UK) medical schools. Methods A national, cross-sectional study assessing all timetabled teachings sessions within UK medical courses for global health content during the academic year 2018/19. Global health content was evaluated against a comprehensive list of global health learning outcomes for medical students. Results Data from 39 medical courses representing 86% (30/36) of eligible medical schools was collected. Typically, medical courses reported timetabled teaching covering over three-quarters of all global health learning outcomes. However, a wide degree of variation existed among granular global health learning objectives covered within the different medical courses. On average, each learning outcome had a 79% [95% CI: 73, 83%] probability of being included in course curricula. There were a number of learning outcomes that had a lower probability, such as ‘access to surgeons with the necessary skills and equipment in different countries’ (36%) [95% CI: 21, 53%], ‘future impact of climate change on health and healthcare systems’ (67%) [95% CI: 50, 81%], and ‘role of the WHO’ (54%) [95% CI: 28, 60%]. Conclusions This study served as the first national assessment of global health education and curricula within UK medical schools. Through a formalised assessment of teaching events produced by medical schools around the country, we were able to capture a national picture of global health education, including the strengths of global health prioritisation in the UK, as well as areas for improvement. Overall, it appears broad-level global health themes are widely discussed; however, the granularities of key, emerging areas of concern are omitted by curricula. In particular, gaps persist relating to international healthcare systems, multilateral global health agencies such as the WHO, global surgery, climate change and more.
topic Global health
Medical education
Medical school
Collaborative
Curricula
Diversity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02315-x
work_keys_str_mv AT incisionukcollaborative globalhealtheducationinmedicalschoolsghemsanationalcollaborativestudyofmedicalcurricula
_version_ 1724449424682254336