Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung

<p>This article explores the interplay of inequality, space and age(ing) from an intersectional perspective. It argues, that a spatial research methodology is most fruitful in order to include age(ing) in debates on intersectionality and inequality. Drawing on geographical gerontology and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Enßle, I. Helbrecht
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-09-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/227/2018/gh-73-227-2018.pdf
id doaj-ea6f1199b78644659baa605bc6722886
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea6f1199b78644659baa605bc67228862020-11-24T21:02:20ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982018-09-017322723910.5194/gh-73-227-2018Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der UngleichheitsforschungF. Enßle0I. Helbrecht1Geographisches Institut, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyGeographisches Institut, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany<p>This article explores the interplay of inequality, space and age(ing) from an intersectional perspective. It argues, that a spatial research methodology is most fruitful in order to include age(ing) in debates on intersectionality and inequality. Drawing on geographical gerontology and inequality research, we scrutinize the research gap at the intersection of these fields: While age is a neglected factor in intersectional debates on inequality, questions of power are hardly addressed by geographical gerontology. To bridge this research gap, we propose space as methodological perspective. By showing how the negotiation of age(ing) varies in different spatial settings, the article emphasises the value of spatial approaches to analyse the two faces of age(ing) – age as a marker of difference and ageing as a process. On a larger scale, the article points to the potential of a spatial methodology to approach the complexity of intersectionality.</p>https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/227/2018/gh-73-227-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Enßle
I. Helbrecht
spellingShingle F. Enßle
I. Helbrecht
Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet F. Enßle
I. Helbrecht
author_sort F. Enßle
title Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
title_short Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
title_full Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
title_fullStr Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
title_full_unstemmed Ungleichheit, Intersektionalität und Alter(n) – für eine räumliche Methodologie in der Ungleichheitsforschung
title_sort ungleichheit, intersektionalität und alter(n) – für eine räumliche methodologie in der ungleichheitsforschung
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2018-09-01
description <p>This article explores the interplay of inequality, space and age(ing) from an intersectional perspective. It argues, that a spatial research methodology is most fruitful in order to include age(ing) in debates on intersectionality and inequality. Drawing on geographical gerontology and inequality research, we scrutinize the research gap at the intersection of these fields: While age is a neglected factor in intersectional debates on inequality, questions of power are hardly addressed by geographical gerontology. To bridge this research gap, we propose space as methodological perspective. By showing how the negotiation of age(ing) varies in different spatial settings, the article emphasises the value of spatial approaches to analyse the two faces of age(ing) – age as a marker of difference and ageing as a process. On a larger scale, the article points to the potential of a spatial methodology to approach the complexity of intersectionality.</p>
url https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/227/2018/gh-73-227-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fenßle ungleichheitintersektionalitatundalternfureineraumlichemethodologieinderungleichheitsforschung
AT ihelbrecht ungleichheitintersektionalitatundalternfureineraumlichemethodologieinderungleichheitsforschung
_version_ 1716775724287787008