Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up

Class II malocclusions, after class I malocclusions, are the most frequent in the juvenile Italian population. They are most often skeletal in origin and due to mandibular retrusion. Functional devices seem to have a beneficial effect on the growth of the jaw. Long-term maintenance of the achieved r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domenico Aiello, Riccardo Nucera, Stefania Costa, Michele Mario Figliuzzi, Sergio Paduano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4810584
id doaj-ea6981b2a5004aee8d0c6fbc007e2b8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea6981b2a5004aee8d0c6fbc007e2b8a2021-10-11T00:39:41ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Dentistry2090-64552021-01-01202110.1155/2021/4810584Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-UpDomenico Aiello0Riccardo Nucera1Stefania Costa2Michele Mario Figliuzzi3Sergio Paduano4Department of HealthDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional ImagingDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional ImagingDepartment of HealthDepartment of HealthClass II malocclusions, after class I malocclusions, are the most frequent in the juvenile Italian population. They are most often skeletal in origin and due to mandibular retrusion. Functional devices seem to have a beneficial effect on the growth of the jaw. Long-term maintenance of the achieved results is essential for therapeutic success in any orthodontic treatment; moreover, the retention phase should last as long as possible, especially in the lower anterior sector. A female patient aged 10 years and 3 months presented a visibly convex profile and a severe mandibular retrusion. The anamnesis brought to light the habit of oral breathing and lower-lip sucking. The cephalometric analysis showed a normodivergent skeletal class II. The first treatment phase involved the use of a Bass type for 12 months at the end of the functional treatment; the second phase of fixed therapy was carried out following the principles of bioprogressive techniques. The photos at the end of treatment show an important improvement in the profile; a full class I ratio of molar and canine teeth was achieved with an excellent interarch relationship and a correction of the V-shaped upper arch. The result is occlusally and profilometrically stable after 2, 4, 5, 10, 14, and 20 years. The maintenance of a stable orthodontic result over time is the result not only of a correct and physiological occlusion but also and above all of a correct diagnosis and correct identification of problems that can cause the malocclusion itself. Flawed habits such as interposition of the lower lip and oral breathing must be intercepted and corrected early in order to correct them and not affect the long-term result of orthodontic treatment. In this case, a functional device associated with an orthodontic fixed finishing and a correct retention phase were necessary to correctly treat a second-class mandibular retrusion whose result remained stable 20 years after the end of therapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4810584
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Domenico Aiello
Riccardo Nucera
Stefania Costa
Michele Mario Figliuzzi
Sergio Paduano
spellingShingle Domenico Aiello
Riccardo Nucera
Stefania Costa
Michele Mario Figliuzzi
Sergio Paduano
Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
Case Reports in Dentistry
author_facet Domenico Aiello
Riccardo Nucera
Stefania Costa
Michele Mario Figliuzzi
Sergio Paduano
author_sort Domenico Aiello
title Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
title_short Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
title_full Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
title_sort can orthodontic treatment be stable 20 years after the end of the treatment scheme? treatment of a class 2, division 1 malocclusion with severe skeletal discrepancy and its 20-year follow-up
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Dentistry
issn 2090-6455
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Class II malocclusions, after class I malocclusions, are the most frequent in the juvenile Italian population. They are most often skeletal in origin and due to mandibular retrusion. Functional devices seem to have a beneficial effect on the growth of the jaw. Long-term maintenance of the achieved results is essential for therapeutic success in any orthodontic treatment; moreover, the retention phase should last as long as possible, especially in the lower anterior sector. A female patient aged 10 years and 3 months presented a visibly convex profile and a severe mandibular retrusion. The anamnesis brought to light the habit of oral breathing and lower-lip sucking. The cephalometric analysis showed a normodivergent skeletal class II. The first treatment phase involved the use of a Bass type for 12 months at the end of the functional treatment; the second phase of fixed therapy was carried out following the principles of bioprogressive techniques. The photos at the end of treatment show an important improvement in the profile; a full class I ratio of molar and canine teeth was achieved with an excellent interarch relationship and a correction of the V-shaped upper arch. The result is occlusally and profilometrically stable after 2, 4, 5, 10, 14, and 20 years. The maintenance of a stable orthodontic result over time is the result not only of a correct and physiological occlusion but also and above all of a correct diagnosis and correct identification of problems that can cause the malocclusion itself. Flawed habits such as interposition of the lower lip and oral breathing must be intercepted and corrected early in order to correct them and not affect the long-term result of orthodontic treatment. In this case, a functional device associated with an orthodontic fixed finishing and a correct retention phase were necessary to correctly treat a second-class mandibular retrusion whose result remained stable 20 years after the end of therapy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4810584
work_keys_str_mv AT domenicoaiello canorthodontictreatmentbestable20yearsaftertheendofthetreatmentschemetreatmentofaclass2division1malocclusionwithsevereskeletaldiscrepancyandits20yearfollowup
AT riccardonucera canorthodontictreatmentbestable20yearsaftertheendofthetreatmentschemetreatmentofaclass2division1malocclusionwithsevereskeletaldiscrepancyandits20yearfollowup
AT stefaniacosta canorthodontictreatmentbestable20yearsaftertheendofthetreatmentschemetreatmentofaclass2division1malocclusionwithsevereskeletaldiscrepancyandits20yearfollowup
AT michelemariofigliuzzi canorthodontictreatmentbestable20yearsaftertheendofthetreatmentschemetreatmentofaclass2division1malocclusionwithsevereskeletaldiscrepancyandits20yearfollowup
AT sergiopaduano canorthodontictreatmentbestable20yearsaftertheendofthetreatmentschemetreatmentofaclass2division1malocclusionwithsevereskeletaldiscrepancyandits20yearfollowup
_version_ 1716829156489035776