Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire

It has become a truism in discussions of Imperialist literature to state that the British empire was, in a very significant way, a textual exercise. Empire was simultaneously created and perpetuated through a proliferation of texts (governmental, legal, educational, scientific, fictional) driven sig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen E. Macfarlane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2016-11-01
Series:Text Matters
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/textmatters/article/view/6961
id doaj-ea65e8d943264328975edcddec211e1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea65e8d943264328975edcddec211e1d2020-11-25T03:27:14ZengLodz University PressText Matters2083-29312084-574X2016-11-016749510.1515/texmat-2016-00056961Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of EmpireKaren E. Macfarlane0Mount Saint Vincent UniversityIt has become a truism in discussions of Imperialist literature to state that the British empire was, in a very significant way, a textual exercise. Empire was simultaneously created and perpetuated through a proliferation of texts (governmental, legal, educational, scientific, fictional) driven significantly by a desire for what Thomas Richards describes as “one great system of knowledge.” The project of assembling this system assumed that all of the “alien” knowledges that it drew upon could be easily assimilated into existing, “universal” (that is, European) epistemological categories. This belief in “one great system” assumed that knowledges from far-flung outposts of empire could, through careful categorization and control, be made to reinforce, rather than threaten, the authority of imperial epistemic rule. But this movement into “new” epistemic as well as physical spaces opened up the disruptive possibility for and encounter with Foucault’s “insurrection of subjugated knowledges.” In the Imperial Gothic stories discussed here, the space between “knowing all there is to know” and the inherent unknowability of the “Other” is played out through representations of failures of classification and anxieties about the limits of knowledge. These anxieties are articulated through what is arguably one of the most heavily regulated signifiers of scientific progress at the turn of the century: the body. In an age that was preoccupied with bodies as spectacles that signified everything from criminal behaviour, psychological disorder, moral standing and racial categorization, the mutable, unclassifiable body functions as a signifier that mediates between imperial fantasies of control and definition and fin-de-siècle anxieties of dissolution and degeneration. In Imperial Gothic fiction these fears appear as a series of complex explorations of the ways in which the gap between the known and the unknown can be charted on and through a monstrous body that moves outside of stable classification.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/textmatters/article/view/6961
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen E. Macfarlane
spellingShingle Karen E. Macfarlane
Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
Text Matters
author_facet Karen E. Macfarlane
author_sort Karen E. Macfarlane
title Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
title_short Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
title_full Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
title_fullStr Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
title_full_unstemmed Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire
title_sort here be monsters: imperialism, knowledge and the limits of empire
publisher Lodz University Press
series Text Matters
issn 2083-2931
2084-574X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description It has become a truism in discussions of Imperialist literature to state that the British empire was, in a very significant way, a textual exercise. Empire was simultaneously created and perpetuated through a proliferation of texts (governmental, legal, educational, scientific, fictional) driven significantly by a desire for what Thomas Richards describes as “one great system of knowledge.” The project of assembling this system assumed that all of the “alien” knowledges that it drew upon could be easily assimilated into existing, “universal” (that is, European) epistemological categories. This belief in “one great system” assumed that knowledges from far-flung outposts of empire could, through careful categorization and control, be made to reinforce, rather than threaten, the authority of imperial epistemic rule. But this movement into “new” epistemic as well as physical spaces opened up the disruptive possibility for and encounter with Foucault’s “insurrection of subjugated knowledges.” In the Imperial Gothic stories discussed here, the space between “knowing all there is to know” and the inherent unknowability of the “Other” is played out through representations of failures of classification and anxieties about the limits of knowledge. These anxieties are articulated through what is arguably one of the most heavily regulated signifiers of scientific progress at the turn of the century: the body. In an age that was preoccupied with bodies as spectacles that signified everything from criminal behaviour, psychological disorder, moral standing and racial categorization, the mutable, unclassifiable body functions as a signifier that mediates between imperial fantasies of control and definition and fin-de-siècle anxieties of dissolution and degeneration. In Imperial Gothic fiction these fears appear as a series of complex explorations of the ways in which the gap between the known and the unknown can be charted on and through a monstrous body that moves outside of stable classification.
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/textmatters/article/view/6961
work_keys_str_mv AT karenemacfarlane herebemonstersimperialismknowledgeandthelimitsofempire
_version_ 1724588885493678080