Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish

The present study investigates motion event expressions and their accompanying gestures in Turkish. Gestures, the non-verbal signals, are assumed to represent cognitive organizations along with speech. It aims to present the lexicalization patterns of motion event descriptions in Turkish to find out...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olcay Türk, Zeynep Doyuran
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Hacettepe University 2018-06-01
Series:Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huefd/issue/37547/438143
id doaj-ea63f8cef74b43f199e5625d93ea91be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea63f8cef74b43f199e5625d93ea91be2021-04-18T09:55:17ZdeuHacettepe UniversityHacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi1301-57372018-06-01351334110.32600/huefd.43814387Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in TurkishOlcay TürkZeynep DoyuranThe present study investigates motion event expressions and their accompanying gestures in Turkish. Gestures, the non-verbal signals, are assumed to represent cognitive organizations along with speech. It aims to present the lexicalization patterns of motion event descriptions in Turkish to find out at what rate Turkish speakers prefer using a gesture to complement speech when describing motion event and how they combine the speech and gestures in V(erb)-framed Turkish language. Furthermore, it tries to explain the relationship between linguistic typology and gestures, depending on Talmy’s (1985) grouping of languages. In order to achieve this aim, the typological features of Turkish are examined in relation to another part of human speech gestures. In order to reach the above-mentioned aims of the study, Turkish speakers’ narrations are analysed. The participants are asked to narrate a story by looking at the drawings of a picture book. Gestures are marked by EXMARaLDA and their types are specified. As a result, it can be claimed that Turkish speakers’ speech and gesture do not follow the typology of their language strictly. One of the important results of this study is that path of the motion is more frequently gestured than the manner of the motion. Furthermore, it has been observed that reoccurring motion verbs are not gestured since the time span between the occurrences of those verbs play an important role in gesturing.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huefd/issue/37547/438143cognitive linguisticsmotion event componentsgesticulationv(erb)-framed and satellite framed languagesbilişsel dilbilimhareket olgusu bileşenlerijestlendirmee(ylem)-çerçeveli ve uydu çerçeveli diller
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olcay Türk
Zeynep Doyuran
spellingShingle Olcay Türk
Zeynep Doyuran
Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
cognitive linguistics
motion event components
gesticulation
v(erb)-framed and satellite framed languages
bilişsel dilbilim
hareket olgusu bileşenleri
jestlendirme
e(ylem)-çerçeveli ve uydu çerçeveli diller
author_facet Olcay Türk
Zeynep Doyuran
author_sort Olcay Türk
title Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
title_short Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
title_full Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
title_fullStr Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
title_full_unstemmed Motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in Turkish
title_sort motion event components and gesticulation as linguistic practice in turkish
publisher Hacettepe University
series Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
issn 1301-5737
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The present study investigates motion event expressions and their accompanying gestures in Turkish. Gestures, the non-verbal signals, are assumed to represent cognitive organizations along with speech. It aims to present the lexicalization patterns of motion event descriptions in Turkish to find out at what rate Turkish speakers prefer using a gesture to complement speech when describing motion event and how they combine the speech and gestures in V(erb)-framed Turkish language. Furthermore, it tries to explain the relationship between linguistic typology and gestures, depending on Talmy’s (1985) grouping of languages. In order to achieve this aim, the typological features of Turkish are examined in relation to another part of human speech gestures. In order to reach the above-mentioned aims of the study, Turkish speakers’ narrations are analysed. The participants are asked to narrate a story by looking at the drawings of a picture book. Gestures are marked by EXMARaLDA and their types are specified. As a result, it can be claimed that Turkish speakers’ speech and gesture do not follow the typology of their language strictly. One of the important results of this study is that path of the motion is more frequently gestured than the manner of the motion. Furthermore, it has been observed that reoccurring motion verbs are not gestured since the time span between the occurrences of those verbs play an important role in gesturing.
topic cognitive linguistics
motion event components
gesticulation
v(erb)-framed and satellite framed languages
bilişsel dilbilim
hareket olgusu bileşenleri
jestlendirme
e(ylem)-çerçeveli ve uydu çerçeveli diller
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/huefd/issue/37547/438143
work_keys_str_mv AT olcayturk motioneventcomponentsandgesticulationaslinguisticpracticeinturkish
AT zeynepdoyuran motioneventcomponentsandgesticulationaslinguisticpracticeinturkish
_version_ 1721523012431249408