Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
Identifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the us...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/full |
id |
doaj-ea5ba9a0fa224af48c7a4315ed819844 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea5ba9a0fa224af48c7a4315ed8198442021-07-20T09:00:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093652093Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?Julia Hein0Stefan Janke1Raven Rinas2Martin Daumiller3Markus Dresel4Oliver Dickhäuser5Department of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyIdentifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the usage of SETs as a learning situation. In a longitudinal study, we investigate the associations between achievement goals and the usage of and learning from SETs in the context of higher education. In total, 407 higher education instructors (46.4% female; 38.60 years on average) with teaching commitments in Germany or Austria reported their achievement goals in an online survey. Out of these participants, 152 instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s) and subsequently reported their intentions to act on the feedback and improve future teaching in a short survey. Using structural equation modeling, we found, in line with our hypotheses, that learning avoidance, appearance approach, and appearance avoidance goals predicted whether instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s). As expected, learning approach and (avoidance) goals were positively associated with intentions to act on received SET-results and improve future teaching. These findings support our hypotheses, are in line with assumptions of self-regulated learning models, and highlight the importance of achievement goals for instructors’ voluntary usage of and intended learning from SET(s). To facilitate instructors’ learning from SET-results, our study constitutes a first step for future intervention studies to build on. Future researchers and practitioners might support instructors’ professional learning by encouraging them to reflect on their SET-results.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/fullachievement goalsinstructorsprofessional learningstudent evaluations of teachinghigher education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julia Hein Stefan Janke Raven Rinas Martin Daumiller Markus Dresel Oliver Dickhäuser |
spellingShingle |
Julia Hein Stefan Janke Raven Rinas Martin Daumiller Markus Dresel Oliver Dickhäuser Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? Frontiers in Psychology achievement goals instructors professional learning student evaluations of teaching higher education |
author_facet |
Julia Hein Stefan Janke Raven Rinas Martin Daumiller Markus Dresel Oliver Dickhäuser |
author_sort |
Julia Hein |
title |
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? |
title_short |
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? |
title_full |
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? |
title_fullStr |
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter? |
title_sort |
higher education instructors’ usage of and learning from student evaluations of teaching – do achievement goals matter? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Identifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the usage of SETs as a learning situation. In a longitudinal study, we investigate the associations between achievement goals and the usage of and learning from SETs in the context of higher education. In total, 407 higher education instructors (46.4% female; 38.60 years on average) with teaching commitments in Germany or Austria reported their achievement goals in an online survey. Out of these participants, 152 instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s) and subsequently reported their intentions to act on the feedback and improve future teaching in a short survey. Using structural equation modeling, we found, in line with our hypotheses, that learning avoidance, appearance approach, and appearance avoidance goals predicted whether instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s). As expected, learning approach and (avoidance) goals were positively associated with intentions to act on received SET-results and improve future teaching. These findings support our hypotheses, are in line with assumptions of self-regulated learning models, and highlight the importance of achievement goals for instructors’ voluntary usage of and intended learning from SET(s). To facilitate instructors’ learning from SET-results, our study constitutes a first step for future intervention studies to build on. Future researchers and practitioners might support instructors’ professional learning by encouraging them to reflect on their SET-results. |
topic |
achievement goals instructors professional learning student evaluations of teaching higher education |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliahein highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter AT stefanjanke highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter AT ravenrinas highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter AT martindaumiller highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter AT markusdresel highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter AT oliverdickhauser highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter |
_version_ |
1721293907021529088 |