Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?

Identifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Hein, Stefan Janke, Raven Rinas, Martin Daumiller, Markus Dresel, Oliver Dickhäuser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/full
id doaj-ea5ba9a0fa224af48c7a4315ed819844
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea5ba9a0fa224af48c7a4315ed8198442021-07-20T09:00:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093652093Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?Julia Hein0Stefan Janke1Raven Rinas2Martin Daumiller3Markus Dresel4Oliver Dickhäuser5Department of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyIdentifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the usage of SETs as a learning situation. In a longitudinal study, we investigate the associations between achievement goals and the usage of and learning from SETs in the context of higher education. In total, 407 higher education instructors (46.4% female; 38.60 years on average) with teaching commitments in Germany or Austria reported their achievement goals in an online survey. Out of these participants, 152 instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s) and subsequently reported their intentions to act on the feedback and improve future teaching in a short survey. Using structural equation modeling, we found, in line with our hypotheses, that learning avoidance, appearance approach, and appearance avoidance goals predicted whether instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s). As expected, learning approach and (avoidance) goals were positively associated with intentions to act on received SET-results and improve future teaching. These findings support our hypotheses, are in line with assumptions of self-regulated learning models, and highlight the importance of achievement goals for instructors’ voluntary usage of and intended learning from SET(s). To facilitate instructors’ learning from SET-results, our study constitutes a first step for future intervention studies to build on. Future researchers and practitioners might support instructors’ professional learning by encouraging them to reflect on their SET-results.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/fullachievement goalsinstructorsprofessional learningstudent evaluations of teachinghigher education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Hein
Stefan Janke
Raven Rinas
Martin Daumiller
Markus Dresel
Oliver Dickhäuser
spellingShingle Julia Hein
Stefan Janke
Raven Rinas
Martin Daumiller
Markus Dresel
Oliver Dickhäuser
Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
Frontiers in Psychology
achievement goals
instructors
professional learning
student evaluations of teaching
higher education
author_facet Julia Hein
Stefan Janke
Raven Rinas
Martin Daumiller
Markus Dresel
Oliver Dickhäuser
author_sort Julia Hein
title Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
title_short Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
title_full Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
title_fullStr Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Higher Education Instructors’ Usage of and Learning From Student Evaluations of Teaching – Do Achievement Goals Matter?
title_sort higher education instructors’ usage of and learning from student evaluations of teaching – do achievement goals matter?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Identifying what motivates and hinders higher education instructors in their self-regulated learning from student evaluations of teaching (SETs) is important for improving future teaching and facilitating student learning. According to models of self-regulated learning, we propose a model for the usage of SETs as a learning situation. In a longitudinal study, we investigate the associations between achievement goals and the usage of and learning from SETs in the context of higher education. In total, 407 higher education instructors (46.4% female; 38.60 years on average) with teaching commitments in Germany or Austria reported their achievement goals in an online survey. Out of these participants, 152 instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s) and subsequently reported their intentions to act on the feedback and improve future teaching in a short survey. Using structural equation modeling, we found, in line with our hypotheses, that learning avoidance, appearance approach, and appearance avoidance goals predicted whether instructors voluntarily conducted SET(s). As expected, learning approach and (avoidance) goals were positively associated with intentions to act on received SET-results and improve future teaching. These findings support our hypotheses, are in line with assumptions of self-regulated learning models, and highlight the importance of achievement goals for instructors’ voluntary usage of and intended learning from SET(s). To facilitate instructors’ learning from SET-results, our study constitutes a first step for future intervention studies to build on. Future researchers and practitioners might support instructors’ professional learning by encouraging them to reflect on their SET-results.
topic achievement goals
instructors
professional learning
student evaluations of teaching
higher education
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652093/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juliahein highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
AT stefanjanke highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
AT ravenrinas highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
AT martindaumiller highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
AT markusdresel highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
AT oliverdickhauser highereducationinstructorsusageofandlearningfromstudentevaluationsofteachingdoachievementgoalsmatter
_version_ 1721293907021529088