On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)

In the field of Hittite linguistic studies, recent scholarship has been especially interested in the nature and origin of the particles so frequently attested in this language. Among the most intriguing of these morphemes is -z( a), about which H.A. Hoffner (1969, 1973) has made important observati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenneth Shields
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) 1993-12-01
Series:Linguistica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/4489
id doaj-ea59e0ef02c34e64b59092eb8cda73c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea59e0ef02c34e64b59092eb8cda73c52020-11-24T21:17:11ZdeuZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Linguistica0024-39222350-420X1993-12-01331On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)Kenneth Shields In the field of Hittite linguistic studies, recent scholarship has been especially interested in the nature and origin of the particles so frequently attested in this language. Among the most intriguing of these morphemes is -z( a), about which H.A. Hoffner (1969, 1973) has made important observations. He points out that, although the use of this particle in verbal sentences has long been correctly identified as "Reflexivum [ ... ], das [ ... ] fiir alle Personen verwendet wird" (Kronasser 1956: 145), "little is known today of the rules governing the occurrence or non-occurrence of -za in the nominal sentence" (1969: 225). His research has led him to conclude that "the first and second person pronouns, when they constitute the subject of the nominal sentence, demand -za or its oblique enclitic pronoun stand-in. Stated differently, when the subject of the nominal sentence is either the speaker or his addressee(s) or both ('inclusive "we"'), the reflexive pronoun is required. When the subject of the nominal sentence is a person or object not involved in the discourse as either addressor or addressee, no need is felt for the reflexive" (1969: 230); instead, "the enclitic -aš may appear for the 3rct person" (Hamp 1984: 58), cf. 11-an-za-wa-za e-eš 'be alive!' and ku-is-wa-ra-aš a-ši DUMU-aš 'who is he, this child?' In this paper 1 want to attempt an explanation of this distribution of -z( a) in nominal sentences by exploring the possible Indo-European etyma of the particle. https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/4489On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth Shields
spellingShingle Kenneth Shields
On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
Linguistica
On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
author_facet Kenneth Shields
author_sort Kenneth Shields
title On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
title_short On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
title_full On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
title_fullStr On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
title_full_unstemmed On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
title_sort on the origin of the hittite particle -z(a)
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
series Linguistica
issn 0024-3922
2350-420X
publishDate 1993-12-01
description In the field of Hittite linguistic studies, recent scholarship has been especially interested in the nature and origin of the particles so frequently attested in this language. Among the most intriguing of these morphemes is -z( a), about which H.A. Hoffner (1969, 1973) has made important observations. He points out that, although the use of this particle in verbal sentences has long been correctly identified as "Reflexivum [ ... ], das [ ... ] fiir alle Personen verwendet wird" (Kronasser 1956: 145), "little is known today of the rules governing the occurrence or non-occurrence of -za in the nominal sentence" (1969: 225). His research has led him to conclude that "the first and second person pronouns, when they constitute the subject of the nominal sentence, demand -za or its oblique enclitic pronoun stand-in. Stated differently, when the subject of the nominal sentence is either the speaker or his addressee(s) or both ('inclusive "we"'), the reflexive pronoun is required. When the subject of the nominal sentence is a person or object not involved in the discourse as either addressor or addressee, no need is felt for the reflexive" (1969: 230); instead, "the enclitic -aš may appear for the 3rct person" (Hamp 1984: 58), cf. 11-an-za-wa-za e-eš 'be alive!' and ku-is-wa-ra-aš a-ši DUMU-aš 'who is he, this child?' In this paper 1 want to attempt an explanation of this distribution of -z( a) in nominal sentences by exploring the possible Indo-European etyma of the particle.
topic On the Origin of the Hittite Particle -z(a)
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/4489
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethshields ontheoriginofthehittiteparticleza
_version_ 1726013700971692032