Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies

This article discusses the relationship between philosophy, archaeological theory and the use of GIS. It is argued that although specific theoretical issues have been discussed, epistemological and ontological questions with regard to the characteristics of data and data processing have not been sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ulla Rajala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2004-11-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
GIS
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16/rajala_index.html
id doaj-ea43f2e04277480b8123e4e463050413
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea43f2e04277480b8123e4e4630504132020-11-25T01:03:51ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872004-11-011610.11141/ia.16.2Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS StudiesUlla Rajala 0University of CambridgeThis article discusses the relationship between philosophy, archaeological theory and the use of GIS. It is argued that although specific theoretical issues have been discussed, epistemological and ontological questions with regard to the characteristics of data and data processing have not been subjected to rigorous theoretical critique. This is essential to understand the archaeological and non-archaeological qualities of data formats and GIS procedures. I am not alone in arguing that GIS has to be integrated into every research process in order to answer archaeological questions and that the results have to be interpreted according to a set archaeological theoretical framework. If the archaeological research process follows the principles of Bhaskar's realistic philosophy the critical application of the method is a natural consequence. It is also argued that the combination of realistic and pragmatic frameworks allows, theoretically, all critical use of archaeological GIS applications. Furthermore, the integration of post-structural ideas is shown to be crucial in the explanation of results provided by GIS modelling.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16/rajala_index.htmlGISphilosophyepistemologyontologyintegrated studiesrealismpragmatism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ulla Rajala
spellingShingle Ulla Rajala
Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
Internet Archaeology
GIS
philosophy
epistemology
ontology
integrated studies
realism
pragmatism
author_facet Ulla Rajala
author_sort Ulla Rajala
title Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
title_short Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
title_full Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
title_fullStr Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
title_full_unstemmed Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies
title_sort sense and sensibility – reflections on the epistemology and ontology of gis studies
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2004-11-01
description This article discusses the relationship between philosophy, archaeological theory and the use of GIS. It is argued that although specific theoretical issues have been discussed, epistemological and ontological questions with regard to the characteristics of data and data processing have not been subjected to rigorous theoretical critique. This is essential to understand the archaeological and non-archaeological qualities of data formats and GIS procedures. I am not alone in arguing that GIS has to be integrated into every research process in order to answer archaeological questions and that the results have to be interpreted according to a set archaeological theoretical framework. If the archaeological research process follows the principles of Bhaskar's realistic philosophy the critical application of the method is a natural consequence. It is also argued that the combination of realistic and pragmatic frameworks allows, theoretically, all critical use of archaeological GIS applications. Furthermore, the integration of post-structural ideas is shown to be crucial in the explanation of results provided by GIS modelling.
topic GIS
philosophy
epistemology
ontology
integrated studies
realism
pragmatism
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16/rajala_index.html
work_keys_str_mv AT ullarajala senseandsensibilityreflectionsontheepistemologyandontologyofgisstudies
_version_ 1725199114092675072