The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cancer patients are at risk of developing blood clots in their veins - venous thromboembolism (VTE) - which often takes the form of a pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The risk increases with advanced disease. Evidence base...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheard Laura, Prout Hayley, Dowding Dawn, Noble Simon, Watt Ian, Maraveyas Anthony, Johnson Miriam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/22
id doaj-ea3367a33db7450ca721ace882cff13e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea3367a33db7450ca721ace882cff13e2020-11-25T03:59:52ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392012-09-011312210.1186/1472-6939-13-22The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative studySheard LauraProut HayleyDowding DawnNoble SimonWatt IanMaraveyas AnthonyJohnson Miriam<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cancer patients are at risk of developing blood clots in their veins - venous thromboembolism (VTE) - which often takes the form of a pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The risk increases with advanced disease. Evidence based treatment is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) by daily subcutaneous injection. The aim of this research is to explore the barriers for doctors in the UK when diagnosing and treating advanced cancer patients with VTE.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>Qualitative, in-depth interview study with 45 doctors (30 across Yorkshire, England and 15 across South Wales). Doctors were from three specialties: oncology, palliative medicine and general practice, with a mixture of senior and junior staff. Framework analysis was used.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Doctors opinions as to whether LMWH treatment was ethically appropriate for patients who were symptomatic from VTE but at end of life existed on a shifting continuum, largely influenced by patient prognosis. A lack of immediate benefit coupled with the discomfort of a daily injection had influenced some doctors not to prescribe LMWH. The point at which LMWH injections should be stopped in patients at the end of life was ambiguous<b>.</b> Some perceived ‘overcaution’ in their own and other clinicians’ treatment of patients<b>.</b> Viewpoints were divergent on whether dying of a PE was considered a “good way to go”. The interventionalism and ethos of palliative medicine was discussed.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Decisions are difficult for doctors to make regarding LMWH treatment for advanced cancer patients with VTE. Treatment for this patient group is bounded to the doctors own moral and ethical frameworks.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/22Venous thromboembolismHeparinLow-molecular-weightPalliative careQualitative researchEthicsMedical
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheard Laura
Prout Hayley
Dowding Dawn
Noble Simon
Watt Ian
Maraveyas Anthony
Johnson Miriam
spellingShingle Sheard Laura
Prout Hayley
Dowding Dawn
Noble Simon
Watt Ian
Maraveyas Anthony
Johnson Miriam
The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
BMC Medical Ethics
Venous thromboembolism
Heparin
Low-molecular-weight
Palliative care
Qualitative research
Ethics
Medical
author_facet Sheard Laura
Prout Hayley
Dowding Dawn
Noble Simon
Watt Ian
Maraveyas Anthony
Johnson Miriam
author_sort Sheard Laura
title The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
title_short The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
title_full The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
title_fullStr The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study
title_sort ethical decisions uk doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: a qualitative study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cancer patients are at risk of developing blood clots in their veins - venous thromboembolism (VTE) - which often takes the form of a pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The risk increases with advanced disease. Evidence based treatment is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) by daily subcutaneous injection. The aim of this research is to explore the barriers for doctors in the UK when diagnosing and treating advanced cancer patients with VTE.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>Qualitative, in-depth interview study with 45 doctors (30 across Yorkshire, England and 15 across South Wales). Doctors were from three specialties: oncology, palliative medicine and general practice, with a mixture of senior and junior staff. Framework analysis was used.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Doctors opinions as to whether LMWH treatment was ethically appropriate for patients who were symptomatic from VTE but at end of life existed on a shifting continuum, largely influenced by patient prognosis. A lack of immediate benefit coupled with the discomfort of a daily injection had influenced some doctors not to prescribe LMWH. The point at which LMWH injections should be stopped in patients at the end of life was ambiguous<b>.</b> Some perceived ‘overcaution’ in their own and other clinicians’ treatment of patients<b>.</b> Viewpoints were divergent on whether dying of a PE was considered a “good way to go”. The interventionalism and ethos of palliative medicine was discussed.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Decisions are difficult for doctors to make regarding LMWH treatment for advanced cancer patients with VTE. Treatment for this patient group is bounded to the doctors own moral and ethical frameworks.</p>
topic Venous thromboembolism
Heparin
Low-molecular-weight
Palliative care
Qualitative research
Ethics
Medical
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/22
work_keys_str_mv AT sheardlaura theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT prouthayley theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT dowdingdawn theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT noblesimon theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT wattian theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT maraveyasanthony theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT johnsonmiriam theethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT sheardlaura ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT prouthayley ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT dowdingdawn ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT noblesimon ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT wattian ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT maraveyasanthony ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
AT johnsonmiriam ethicaldecisionsukdoctorsmakeregardingadvancedcancerpatientsattheendoflifetheperceivedinappropriatenessofanticoagulationforvenousthromboembolismaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1724452472955600896