Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa

<p><strong><em>Neither Fish, Flesh, nor Fowl. The Stadholder’s Court in Dynastic Europe</em></strong><br />This contribution presents a concise image of the recent historiography on the European dynastic court, and then places the stadholder’s court within this co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. Duindam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2009-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/7046
id doaj-ea310fe713f64f798b3a69ba75306258
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea310fe713f64f798b3a69ba753062582021-10-02T01:58:28ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982009-01-01124453655810.18352/bmgn-lchr.70467014Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek EuropaJ. Duindam<p><strong><em>Neither Fish, Flesh, nor Fowl. The Stadholder’s Court in Dynastic Europe</em></strong><br />This contribution presents a concise image of the recent historiography on the European dynastic court, and then places the stadholder’s court within this context. The modest contours of the latter stand out sharply against developments elsewhere, such as the secular Electors of the Holy Roman Empire, for example. However, the stadholder’s court was far more than just the household of a high-ranking magistrate of noble birth, even though the group of courtiers and servants around the stadholder remained modest in terms of its size and structure. Nor did a wider circle of visitors and clients ever really materialise.</p><p> </p><p>The absence of any sovereign basis for the position of stadholder in the Republic apparently made it difficult to turn court life into an instrument for the further advancement of power. Nevertheless, in his capacity as a ‘servant’ of the state machine, the stadholder was able to play a remarkable role under William III – and subsequent generations of stadholders even played a decisive role – within the system of nomination rights and the power relations that stemmed from that.</p><p> </p><p>This article is part of the special issue '<a href="/420/volume/124/issue/4/">The Internationalization of the National History and the Pillarization</a>'.</p>https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/7046History (historiography)Court culture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Duindam
spellingShingle J. Duindam
Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
History (historiography)
Court culture
author_facet J. Duindam
author_sort J. Duindam
title Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
title_short Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
title_full Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
title_fullStr Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
title_full_unstemmed Tussen tafellaken en servet. Het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek Europa
title_sort tussen tafellaken en servet. het stadhouderlijk hof in dynastiek europa
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p><strong><em>Neither Fish, Flesh, nor Fowl. The Stadholder’s Court in Dynastic Europe</em></strong><br />This contribution presents a concise image of the recent historiography on the European dynastic court, and then places the stadholder’s court within this context. The modest contours of the latter stand out sharply against developments elsewhere, such as the secular Electors of the Holy Roman Empire, for example. However, the stadholder’s court was far more than just the household of a high-ranking magistrate of noble birth, even though the group of courtiers and servants around the stadholder remained modest in terms of its size and structure. Nor did a wider circle of visitors and clients ever really materialise.</p><p> </p><p>The absence of any sovereign basis for the position of stadholder in the Republic apparently made it difficult to turn court life into an instrument for the further advancement of power. Nevertheless, in his capacity as a ‘servant’ of the state machine, the stadholder was able to play a remarkable role under William III – and subsequent generations of stadholders even played a decisive role – within the system of nomination rights and the power relations that stemmed from that.</p><p> </p><p>This article is part of the special issue '<a href="/420/volume/124/issue/4/">The Internationalization of the National History and the Pillarization</a>'.</p>
topic History (historiography)
Court culture
url https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/7046
work_keys_str_mv AT jduindam tussentafellakenenservethetstadhouderlijkhofindynastiekeuropa
_version_ 1716860496311746560