Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
It appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Dialogic Pedagogy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123 |
id |
doaj-ea2fb36d2a3e4751b2a1f54dc31a52c9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea2fb36d2a3e4751b2a1f54dc31a52c92020-11-24T21:32:26ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghDialogic Pedagogy2325-32902014-10-012010.5195/dpj.2014.12342Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic PedagogyPaul Sullivan0University of BradfordIt appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told that arguments “fail” (above, p.16); that terms “are not clearly defined” (p.21), breakthroughs in classification (e.g. epistemological dialogical pedagogy) are tackled and dragged down to personal eccentricities “his so-called epistemological dialogical pedagogy” (p.22), politeness tries to get a grip periodically, “I agree. But maybe I agree with Kiyo only to a point” but shouting (e.g. capital letters/underlining terms – e.g. “NOT the exclusive practice” (p.26)) and assertions take over. Accusation fly - sometimes to the point of legal charges “I charge the Epistemological Pedagogical Dialogue II with...” (p.29).http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123author - heropedagogical violenceeros |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul Sullivan |
spellingShingle |
Paul Sullivan Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy Dialogic Pedagogy author - hero pedagogical violence eros |
author_facet |
Paul Sullivan |
author_sort |
Paul Sullivan |
title |
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy |
title_short |
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy |
title_full |
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy |
title_fullStr |
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy |
title_sort |
dialogue on dialogue on dialogic pedagogy |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Dialogic Pedagogy |
issn |
2325-3290 |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
It appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told that arguments “fail” (above, p.16); that terms “are not clearly defined” (p.21), breakthroughs in classification (e.g. epistemological dialogical pedagogy) are tackled and dragged down to personal eccentricities “his so-called epistemological dialogical pedagogy” (p.22), politeness tries to get a grip periodically, “I agree. But maybe I agree with Kiyo only to a point” but shouting (e.g. capital letters/underlining terms – e.g. “NOT the exclusive practice” (p.26)) and assertions take over. Accusation fly - sometimes to the point of legal charges “I charge the Epistemological Pedagogical Dialogue II with...” (p.29). |
topic |
author - hero pedagogical violence eros |
url |
http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulsullivan dialogueondialogueondialogicpedagogy |
_version_ |
1725957569033273344 |