Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy

It appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Sullivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2014-10-01
Series:Dialogic Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123
id doaj-ea2fb36d2a3e4751b2a1f54dc31a52c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea2fb36d2a3e4751b2a1f54dc31a52c92020-11-24T21:32:26ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghDialogic Pedagogy2325-32902014-10-012010.5195/dpj.2014.12342Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic PedagogyPaul Sullivan0University of BradfordIt appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told that arguments “fail” (above, p.16); that terms “are not clearly defined” (p.21), breakthroughs in classification (e.g. epistemological dialogical pedagogy) are tackled and dragged down to personal eccentricities “his so-called epistemological dialogical pedagogy” (p.22), politeness tries to get a grip periodically, “I agree. But maybe I agree with Kiyo only to a point” but shouting (e.g. capital letters/underlining terms – e.g. “NOT the exclusive practice” (p.26)) and assertions take over. Accusation fly - sometimes to the point of legal charges “I charge the Epistemological Pedagogical Dialogue II with...” (p.29).http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123author - heropedagogical violenceeros
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Sullivan
spellingShingle Paul Sullivan
Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
Dialogic Pedagogy
author - hero
pedagogical violence
eros
author_facet Paul Sullivan
author_sort Paul Sullivan
title Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
title_short Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
title_full Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
title_fullStr Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
title_sort dialogue on dialogue on dialogic pedagogy
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Dialogic Pedagogy
issn 2325-3290
publishDate 2014-10-01
description It appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told that arguments “fail” (above, p.16); that terms “are not clearly defined” (p.21), breakthroughs in classification (e.g. epistemological dialogical pedagogy) are tackled and dragged down to personal eccentricities “his so-called epistemological dialogical pedagogy” (p.22), politeness tries to get a grip periodically, “I agree. But maybe I agree with Kiyo only to a point” but shouting (e.g. capital letters/underlining terms – e.g. “NOT the exclusive practice” (p.26)) and assertions take over. Accusation fly - sometimes to the point of legal charges “I charge the Epistemological Pedagogical Dialogue II with...” (p.29).
topic author - hero
pedagogical violence
eros
url http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/123
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsullivan dialogueondialogueondialogicpedagogy
_version_ 1725957569033273344