A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies

Abstract Background The main purpose of dose-finding studies in Phase I trial is to estimate maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is the maximum test dose that can be assigned with an acceptable level of toxicity. Existing methods developed for single-agent dose-finding assume that the dose-toxicity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niansheng Tang, Songjian Wang, Gen Ye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0604-9
id doaj-ea2efeb320b94d2eb0a1122ff1abc4c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea2efeb320b94d2eb0a1122ff1abc4c12020-11-25T02:10:07ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882018-12-0118111310.1186/s12874-018-0604-9A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studiesNiansheng Tang0Songjian Wang1Gen Ye2Key Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan Province, Yunnan UniversityKey Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan Province, Yunnan UniversityKey Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan Province, Yunnan UniversityAbstract Background The main purpose of dose-finding studies in Phase I trial is to estimate maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is the maximum test dose that can be assigned with an acceptable level of toxicity. Existing methods developed for single-agent dose-finding assume that the dose-toxicity relationship follows a specific parametric potency curve. This assumption may lead to bias and unsafe dose escalations due to the misspecification of parametric curve. Methods This paper relaxes the parametric assumption of dose-toxicity relationship by imposing a Dirichlet process prior on unknown dose-toxicity curve. A hybrid algorithm combining the Gibbs sampler and adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling (ARMS) algorithm is developed to estimate the dose-toxicity curve, and a two-stage Bayesian nonparametric adaptive design is presented to estimate MTD. Results For comparison, we consider two classical continual reassessment methods (CRMs) (i.e., logistic and power models). Numerical results show the flexibility of the proposed method for single-agent dose-finding trials, and the proposed method behaves better than two classical CRMs under our considered scenarios. Conclusions The proposed dose-finding procedure is model-free and robust, and behaves satisfactorily even in small sample cases.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0604-9Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling algorithmContinual reassessment methodDirichlet process priorDose-finding designGibbs samplerMaximum tolerated dose
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niansheng Tang
Songjian Wang
Gen Ye
spellingShingle Niansheng Tang
Songjian Wang
Gen Ye
A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling algorithm
Continual reassessment method
Dirichlet process prior
Dose-finding design
Gibbs sampler
Maximum tolerated dose
author_facet Niansheng Tang
Songjian Wang
Gen Ye
author_sort Niansheng Tang
title A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
title_short A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
title_full A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
title_fullStr A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
title_full_unstemmed A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
title_sort nonparametric bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background The main purpose of dose-finding studies in Phase I trial is to estimate maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is the maximum test dose that can be assigned with an acceptable level of toxicity. Existing methods developed for single-agent dose-finding assume that the dose-toxicity relationship follows a specific parametric potency curve. This assumption may lead to bias and unsafe dose escalations due to the misspecification of parametric curve. Methods This paper relaxes the parametric assumption of dose-toxicity relationship by imposing a Dirichlet process prior on unknown dose-toxicity curve. A hybrid algorithm combining the Gibbs sampler and adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling (ARMS) algorithm is developed to estimate the dose-toxicity curve, and a two-stage Bayesian nonparametric adaptive design is presented to estimate MTD. Results For comparison, we consider two classical continual reassessment methods (CRMs) (i.e., logistic and power models). Numerical results show the flexibility of the proposed method for single-agent dose-finding trials, and the proposed method behaves better than two classical CRMs under our considered scenarios. Conclusions The proposed dose-finding procedure is model-free and robust, and behaves satisfactorily even in small sample cases.
topic Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling algorithm
Continual reassessment method
Dirichlet process prior
Dose-finding design
Gibbs sampler
Maximum tolerated dose
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0604-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nianshengtang anonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
AT songjianwang anonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
AT genye anonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
AT nianshengtang nonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
AT songjianwang nonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
AT genye nonparametricbayesiancontinualreassessmentmethodinsingleagentdosefindingstudies
_version_ 1724920634962608128