Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood

This review article discusses the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) in support of a total diet approach to achieving diet and health goals, especially as they relate to the obesity epidemic. However, some scientists and organizations have identified one food, food group, or nutrient as the caus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Theresa A. Nicklas, Carol E. O’Neil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2014-06-01
Series:AIMS Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140207&flag=1
id doaj-ea2e22b0007d40c0a8bd6b5e2620905a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea2e22b0007d40c0a8bd6b5e2620905a2020-11-24T22:49:47ZengAIMS PressAIMS Public Health2327-89942014-06-011210912210.3934/public health.2014.2.109Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly UnderstoodTheresa A. Nicklas0Carol E. O’Neil1USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 Bates Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USALouisiana State University Agricultural Center, 261 Knapp Hall, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USAThis review article discusses the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) in support of a total diet approach to achieving diet and health goals, especially as they relate to the obesity epidemic. However, some scientists and organizations have identified one food, food group, or nutrient as the cause of the obesity epidemic and recommend that simply reducing that food/food group/nutrient will solve the problem. This is simplistic and unlikely to be effective in long term management of the obesity problem. This article also acknowledges discrepancies in the literature and the lack of consensus opinions from systematic reviews. Failure to consider the evidence as a whole can lead to inaccurate reports which may, in turn, adversely influence clinical practice, public policy, and future research. This article also considers where the line should be drawn between individual choice and responsibility and public regulation. Using sugar sweetened beverages as an example, the article considers the lack of a consistent association between added sugars and weight in the literature and calls for policy recommendations that are based on science and emphasizes the need for evidence-based policies rather than policy-based evidence.http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140207&flag=1obesitySugar-Sweetened beveragessoda taxdietary recommendationstotal diet
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Theresa A. Nicklas
Carol E. O’Neil
spellingShingle Theresa A. Nicklas
Carol E. O’Neil
Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
AIMS Public Health
obesity
Sugar-Sweetened beverages
soda tax
dietary recommendations
total diet
author_facet Theresa A. Nicklas
Carol E. O’Neil
author_sort Theresa A. Nicklas
title Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
title_short Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
title_full Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
title_fullStr Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Obesity: A Public Health Problem Poorly Understood
title_sort prevalence of obesity: a public health problem poorly understood
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Public Health
issn 2327-8994
publishDate 2014-06-01
description This review article discusses the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) in support of a total diet approach to achieving diet and health goals, especially as they relate to the obesity epidemic. However, some scientists and organizations have identified one food, food group, or nutrient as the cause of the obesity epidemic and recommend that simply reducing that food/food group/nutrient will solve the problem. This is simplistic and unlikely to be effective in long term management of the obesity problem. This article also acknowledges discrepancies in the literature and the lack of consensus opinions from systematic reviews. Failure to consider the evidence as a whole can lead to inaccurate reports which may, in turn, adversely influence clinical practice, public policy, and future research. This article also considers where the line should be drawn between individual choice and responsibility and public regulation. Using sugar sweetened beverages as an example, the article considers the lack of a consistent association between added sugars and weight in the literature and calls for policy recommendations that are based on science and emphasizes the need for evidence-based policies rather than policy-based evidence.
topic obesity
Sugar-Sweetened beverages
soda tax
dietary recommendations
total diet
url http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140207&flag=1
work_keys_str_mv AT theresaanicklas prevalenceofobesityapublichealthproblempoorlyunderstood
AT caroleoneil prevalenceofobesityapublichealthproblempoorlyunderstood
_version_ 1725675154015518720