Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges

Detention of migrants in Europe has become an increasingly common measure to deal with the growing number of people crossing EU borders seeking asylum. Detention is presented as a rational response to the need for ‘border control’ despite the growing international and European jurisprudence and camp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Šárka Dušková
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Groningen Press 2017-09-01
Series:Groningen Journal of International Law
Online Access:https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/30289
id doaj-ea2124e08c574c4ca47fcec23a735a2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea2124e08c574c4ca47fcec23a735a2e2021-08-24T12:12:10ZengUniversity of Groningen PressGroningen Journal of International Law2352-26742017-09-0151233310.21827/59db69a9004df20337Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and ChallengesŠárka DuškováDetention of migrants in Europe has become an increasingly common measure to deal with the growing number of people crossing EU borders seeking asylum. Detention is presented as a rational response to the need for ‘border control’ despite the growing international and European jurisprudence and campaigns calling for a more careful and restrained approach to its use. Especially in some of the EU member states, the disparity between international legal standards and the almost automatic use of detention of an irregular migrant or asylum seeker is a cause for attention. The article first offers an overview of the relevant legal standards for detention of migrants and complements this with relevant data about its practical use. Drawing on previous work in this area, the author suggests that there are various complementary motivations for the use of detention of migrants. As only the practical motive can be the one to justify detention formally and legally, the article offers an analysis of rationality of the use of detention vis-à-vis the known alternatives. The predominance of different kinds of alternatives in the EU to detention is also explored. The article concludes with the suggestion that to fulfil all state motivations for the use of detention, the introduction of a range of alternatives complemented with the change of discourse may in fact be a rational move for states.https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/30289
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Šárka Dušková
spellingShingle Šárka Dušková
Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
Groningen Journal of International Law
author_facet Šárka Dušková
author_sort Šárka Dušková
title Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
title_short Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
title_full Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
title_fullStr Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Migration Control and Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers – Motivations, Rationale and Challenges
title_sort migration control and detention of migrants and asylum seekers – motivations, rationale and challenges
publisher University of Groningen Press
series Groningen Journal of International Law
issn 2352-2674
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Detention of migrants in Europe has become an increasingly common measure to deal with the growing number of people crossing EU borders seeking asylum. Detention is presented as a rational response to the need for ‘border control’ despite the growing international and European jurisprudence and campaigns calling for a more careful and restrained approach to its use. Especially in some of the EU member states, the disparity between international legal standards and the almost automatic use of detention of an irregular migrant or asylum seeker is a cause for attention. The article first offers an overview of the relevant legal standards for detention of migrants and complements this with relevant data about its practical use. Drawing on previous work in this area, the author suggests that there are various complementary motivations for the use of detention of migrants. As only the practical motive can be the one to justify detention formally and legally, the article offers an analysis of rationality of the use of detention vis-à-vis the known alternatives. The predominance of different kinds of alternatives in the EU to detention is also explored. The article concludes with the suggestion that to fulfil all state motivations for the use of detention, the introduction of a range of alternatives complemented with the change of discourse may in fact be a rational move for states.
url https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/30289
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkaduskova migrationcontrolanddetentionofmigrantsandasylumseekersmotivationsrationaleandchallenges
_version_ 1721197648727244800