Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those d...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
2012-01-01
|
Series: | INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253 |
id |
doaj-ea1e43d3f6104a19bc36aefb1b5ddfd6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea1e43d3f6104a19bc36aefb1b5ddfd62020-11-24T23:06:26ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172012-01-013110.24926/iip.v3i1.253Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access HospitalsMadeline Carpinelli WallackTodd Sorensen Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those designated as "orphan." Because this policy is unprecedented, this study quantifies the gross financial impact that this exemption has on a group of CAHs. Methods: Drug spending for 2010 from 18 CAHs in Minnesota and Wisconsin are reviewed to identify the prevalence of orphan drug purchases and to calculate the price differentials between the 340B price and the hospitals' current cost. Results: The 18 CAHs' purchases of orphan drugs comprise an average of 44% of the total annual drug budgets, but only 5% of units purchased, thus representing a very high proportion of their expenditures. In the aggregate, the 18 hospitals would have saved $3.1 million ($171,000 average per hospital) had purchases of drugs with orphan designations been made at the 340B price. Because CAH claims for Medicare are reimbursed on a cost-basis, the Federal government is losing an opportunity for savings. Conclusion: The high prevalence of orphan drug use and considerable potential for cost reduction through the 340B program demonstrate the loss of benefit to the hospitals, Federal government and the states. Type: Original Research https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253340B Drug Discount Programcritical access hospitalsorphan drugs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Madeline Carpinelli Wallack Todd Sorensen |
spellingShingle |
Madeline Carpinelli Wallack Todd Sorensen Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy 340B Drug Discount Program critical access hospitals orphan drugs |
author_facet |
Madeline Carpinelli Wallack Todd Sorensen |
author_sort |
Madeline Carpinelli Wallack |
title |
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals |
title_short |
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals |
title_full |
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals |
title_fullStr |
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals |
title_sort |
excluding orphan drugs from the 340b drug discount program: the impact on 18 critical access hospitals |
publisher |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing |
series |
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy |
issn |
2155-0417 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those designated as "orphan." Because this policy is unprecedented, this study quantifies the gross financial impact that this exemption has on a group of CAHs.
Methods: Drug spending for 2010 from 18 CAHs in Minnesota and Wisconsin are reviewed to identify the prevalence of orphan drug purchases and to calculate the price differentials between the 340B price and the hospitals' current cost.
Results: The 18 CAHs' purchases of orphan drugs comprise an average of 44% of the total annual drug budgets, but only 5% of units purchased, thus representing a very high proportion of their expenditures. In the aggregate, the 18 hospitals would have saved $3.1 million ($171,000 average per hospital) had purchases of drugs with orphan designations been made at the 340B price. Because CAH claims for Medicare are reimbursed on a cost-basis, the Federal government is losing an opportunity for savings.
Conclusion: The high prevalence of orphan drug use and considerable potential for cost reduction through the 340B program demonstrate the loss of benefit to the hospitals, Federal government and the states.
Type: Original Research
|
topic |
340B Drug Discount Program critical access hospitals orphan drugs |
url |
https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT madelinecarpinelliwallack excludingorphandrugsfromthe340bdrugdiscountprogramtheimpacton18criticalaccesshospitals AT toddsorensen excludingorphandrugsfromthe340bdrugdiscountprogramtheimpacton18criticalaccesshospitals |
_version_ |
1725623130060226560 |