Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals

Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madeline Carpinelli Wallack, Todd Sorensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2012-01-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253
id doaj-ea1e43d3f6104a19bc36aefb1b5ddfd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea1e43d3f6104a19bc36aefb1b5ddfd62020-11-24T23:06:26ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172012-01-013110.24926/iip.v3i1.253Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access HospitalsMadeline Carpinelli WallackTodd Sorensen Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those designated as "orphan." Because this policy is unprecedented, this study quantifies the gross financial impact that this exemption has on a group of CAHs. Methods: Drug spending for 2010 from 18 CAHs in Minnesota and Wisconsin are reviewed to identify the prevalence of orphan drug purchases and to calculate the price differentials between the 340B price and the hospitals' current cost. Results: The 18 CAHs' purchases of orphan drugs comprise an average of 44% of the total annual drug budgets, but only 5% of units purchased, thus representing a very high proportion of their expenditures. In the aggregate, the 18 hospitals would have saved $3.1 million ($171,000 average per hospital) had purchases of drugs with orphan designations been made at the 340B price. Because CAH claims for Medicare are reimbursed on a cost-basis, the Federal government is losing an opportunity for savings. Conclusion: The high prevalence of orphan drug use and considerable potential for cost reduction through the 340B program demonstrate the loss of benefit to the hospitals, Federal government and the states.   Type: Original Research https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253340B Drug Discount Programcritical access hospitalsorphan drugs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madeline Carpinelli Wallack
Todd Sorensen
spellingShingle Madeline Carpinelli Wallack
Todd Sorensen
Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
340B Drug Discount Program
critical access hospitals
orphan drugs
author_facet Madeline Carpinelli Wallack
Todd Sorensen
author_sort Madeline Carpinelli Wallack
title Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
title_short Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
title_full Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
title_fullStr Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Excluding Orphan Drugs from the 340B Drug Discount Program: the Impact on 18 Critical Access Hospitals
title_sort excluding orphan drugs from the 340b drug discount program: the impact on 18 critical access hospitals
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Purpose: The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal program designed to reduce the amount that safety net providers spend on outpatient drugs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 extended eligibility for 340B to critical access hospitals (CAHs) for all drugs except those designated as "orphan." Because this policy is unprecedented, this study quantifies the gross financial impact that this exemption has on a group of CAHs. Methods: Drug spending for 2010 from 18 CAHs in Minnesota and Wisconsin are reviewed to identify the prevalence of orphan drug purchases and to calculate the price differentials between the 340B price and the hospitals' current cost. Results: The 18 CAHs' purchases of orphan drugs comprise an average of 44% of the total annual drug budgets, but only 5% of units purchased, thus representing a very high proportion of their expenditures. In the aggregate, the 18 hospitals would have saved $3.1 million ($171,000 average per hospital) had purchases of drugs with orphan designations been made at the 340B price. Because CAH claims for Medicare are reimbursed on a cost-basis, the Federal government is losing an opportunity for savings. Conclusion: The high prevalence of orphan drug use and considerable potential for cost reduction through the 340B program demonstrate the loss of benefit to the hospitals, Federal government and the states.   Type: Original Research
topic 340B Drug Discount Program
critical access hospitals
orphan drugs
url https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/253
work_keys_str_mv AT madelinecarpinelliwallack excludingorphandrugsfromthe340bdrugdiscountprogramtheimpacton18criticalaccesshospitals
AT toddsorensen excludingorphandrugsfromthe340bdrugdiscountprogramtheimpacton18criticalaccesshospitals
_version_ 1725623130060226560