Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
De-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distributio...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ea18529cce554810b612bcba6435aeb6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea18529cce554810b612bcba6435aeb62020-11-25T01:53:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e11073310.1371/journal.pone.0110733Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.Yan-Fang SangChangming LiuZhonggen WangJun WenLunyu ShangDe-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distribution, which is established from Monte-Carlo test. Differing from wavelet threshold de-noising (WTD) method with the basis of wavelet coefficient thresholding, the proposed method is based on energy distribution of series. It can distinguish noise from deterministic components in series, and uncertainty of de-noising result can be quantitatively estimated using proper confidence interval, but WTD method cannot do this. Analysis of both synthetic and observed series verified the comparable power of the proposed method and WTD, but de-noising process by the former is more easily operable. The results also indicate the influences of three key factors (wavelet choice, decomposition level choice and noise content) on wavelet de-noising. Wavelet should be carefully chosen when using the proposed method. The suitable decomposition level for wavelet de-noising should correspond to series' deterministic sub-signal which has the smallest temporal scale. If too much noise is included in a series, accurate de-noising result cannot be obtained by the proposed method or WTD, but the series would show pure random but not autocorrelation characters, so de-noising is no longer needed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yan-Fang Sang Changming Liu Zhonggen Wang Jun Wen Lunyu Shang |
spellingShingle |
Yan-Fang Sang Changming Liu Zhonggen Wang Jun Wen Lunyu Shang Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yan-Fang Sang Changming Liu Zhonggen Wang Jun Wen Lunyu Shang |
author_sort |
Yan-Fang Sang |
title |
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
title_short |
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
title_full |
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
title_fullStr |
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
title_sort |
energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
De-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distribution, which is established from Monte-Carlo test. Differing from wavelet threshold de-noising (WTD) method with the basis of wavelet coefficient thresholding, the proposed method is based on energy distribution of series. It can distinguish noise from deterministic components in series, and uncertainty of de-noising result can be quantitatively estimated using proper confidence interval, but WTD method cannot do this. Analysis of both synthetic and observed series verified the comparable power of the proposed method and WTD, but de-noising process by the former is more easily operable. The results also indicate the influences of three key factors (wavelet choice, decomposition level choice and noise content) on wavelet de-noising. Wavelet should be carefully chosen when using the proposed method. The suitable decomposition level for wavelet de-noising should correspond to series' deterministic sub-signal which has the smallest temporal scale. If too much noise is included in a series, accurate de-noising result cannot be obtained by the proposed method or WTD, but the series would show pure random but not autocorrelation characters, so de-noising is no longer needed. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanfangsang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries AT changmingliu energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries AT zhonggenwang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries AT junwen energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries AT lunyushang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries |
_version_ |
1724990769941446656 |