Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.

De-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distributio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan-Fang Sang, Changming Liu, Zhonggen Wang, Jun Wen, Lunyu Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render
id doaj-ea18529cce554810b612bcba6435aeb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea18529cce554810b612bcba6435aeb62020-11-25T01:53:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e11073310.1371/journal.pone.0110733Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.Yan-Fang SangChangming LiuZhonggen WangJun WenLunyu ShangDe-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distribution, which is established from Monte-Carlo test. Differing from wavelet threshold de-noising (WTD) method with the basis of wavelet coefficient thresholding, the proposed method is based on energy distribution of series. It can distinguish noise from deterministic components in series, and uncertainty of de-noising result can be quantitatively estimated using proper confidence interval, but WTD method cannot do this. Analysis of both synthetic and observed series verified the comparable power of the proposed method and WTD, but de-noising process by the former is more easily operable. The results also indicate the influences of three key factors (wavelet choice, decomposition level choice and noise content) on wavelet de-noising. Wavelet should be carefully chosen when using the proposed method. The suitable decomposition level for wavelet de-noising should correspond to series' deterministic sub-signal which has the smallest temporal scale. If too much noise is included in a series, accurate de-noising result cannot be obtained by the proposed method or WTD, but the series would show pure random but not autocorrelation characters, so de-noising is no longer needed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yan-Fang Sang
Changming Liu
Zhonggen Wang
Jun Wen
Lunyu Shang
spellingShingle Yan-Fang Sang
Changming Liu
Zhonggen Wang
Jun Wen
Lunyu Shang
Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yan-Fang Sang
Changming Liu
Zhonggen Wang
Jun Wen
Lunyu Shang
author_sort Yan-Fang Sang
title Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
title_short Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
title_full Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
title_fullStr Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
title_full_unstemmed Energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
title_sort energy-based wavelet de-noising of hydrologic time series.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description De-noising is a substantial issue in hydrologic time series analysis, but it is a difficult task due to the defect of methods. In this paper an energy-based wavelet de-noising method was proposed. It is to remove noise by comparing energy distribution of series with the background energy distribution, which is established from Monte-Carlo test. Differing from wavelet threshold de-noising (WTD) method with the basis of wavelet coefficient thresholding, the proposed method is based on energy distribution of series. It can distinguish noise from deterministic components in series, and uncertainty of de-noising result can be quantitatively estimated using proper confidence interval, but WTD method cannot do this. Analysis of both synthetic and observed series verified the comparable power of the proposed method and WTD, but de-noising process by the former is more easily operable. The results also indicate the influences of three key factors (wavelet choice, decomposition level choice and noise content) on wavelet de-noising. Wavelet should be carefully chosen when using the proposed method. The suitable decomposition level for wavelet de-noising should correspond to series' deterministic sub-signal which has the smallest temporal scale. If too much noise is included in a series, accurate de-noising result cannot be obtained by the proposed method or WTD, but the series would show pure random but not autocorrelation characters, so de-noising is no longer needed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4215914?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yanfangsang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries
AT changmingliu energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries
AT zhonggenwang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries
AT junwen energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries
AT lunyushang energybasedwaveletdenoisingofhydrologictimeseries
_version_ 1724990769941446656