The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects

The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects

This article inquires the relevancy of multiple temporalisations for the discourse analysis of testimonial interviews. Step by step and by help of a range of empirical cases, the author widens the analytical scope (from questions, lines of questions, to supported interrogation by help of files and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Scheffer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2007-01-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
duplicity
speech production
speech reception
conversation analysis
discourse analysis
trans-sequential analysis
temporalisation
forensic interrogation
qualitative interviews
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/205
id doaj-ea0fde31cd574882abbcdf45130ea7b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea0fde31cd574882abbcdf45130ea7b32020-11-25T01:09:21ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272007-01-0181204The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and ProjectsThomas Scheffer0Goethe University, Frankfurt/MainThis article inquires the relevancy of multiple temporalisations for the discourse analysis of testimonial interviews. Step by step and by help of a range of empirical cases, the author widens the analytical scope (from questions, lines of questions, to supported interrogation by help of files and archives). He does so in order to reconstruct the efficient resources and means of forensic and administrative interrogations. The interviews turn out to be most powerful once they establish duplicity, meaning a partial separation of speech-production and speech-reception. Conclusively the author argues for a symmetrical view on scientific (qualitative) interviews and forensic interrogation. The separation of production and reception is widely ignored in qualitative methods. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701159http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/205duplicityspeech productionspeech receptionconversation analysisdiscourse analysistrans-sequential analysistemporalisationforensic interrogationqualitative interviews
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Scheffer
spellingShingle Thomas Scheffer
The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
duplicity
speech production
speech reception
conversation analysis
discourse analysis
trans-sequential analysis
temporalisation
forensic interrogation
qualitative interviews
author_facet Thomas Scheffer
author_sort Thomas Scheffer
title The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
title_short The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
title_full The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
title_fullStr The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
title_full_unstemmed The Duplicity of Testimonial Interviews—Unfolding and Utilising Multiple Temporalisation in Compound Procedures and Projects
title_sort duplicity of testimonial interviews—unfolding and utilising multiple temporalisation in compound procedures and projects
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2007-01-01
description This article inquires the relevancy of multiple temporalisations for the discourse analysis of testimonial interviews. Step by step and by help of a range of empirical cases, the author widens the analytical scope (from questions, lines of questions, to supported interrogation by help of files and archives). He does so in order to reconstruct the efficient resources and means of forensic and administrative interrogations. The interviews turn out to be most powerful once they establish duplicity, meaning a partial separation of speech-production and speech-reception. Conclusively the author argues for a symmetrical view on scientific (qualitative) interviews and forensic interrogation. The separation of production and reception is widely ignored in qualitative methods. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701159
topic duplicity
speech production
speech reception
conversation analysis
discourse analysis
trans-sequential analysis
temporalisation
forensic interrogation
qualitative interviews
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/205
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasscheffer theduplicityoftestimonialinterviewsunfoldingandutilisingmultipletemporalisationincompoundproceduresandprojects
AT thomasscheffer duplicityoftestimonialinterviewsunfoldingandutilisingmultipletemporalisationincompoundproceduresandprojects
_version_ 1725179474846154752

Similar Items