Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes

Abstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Larouche, Miriam L. Zelditch, Richard Cloutier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y
id doaj-ea0173e05d1a429d8b1915e48f1c6564
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea0173e05d1a429d8b1915e48f1c65642020-12-08T05:55:26ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-05-01811610.1038/s41598-018-25715-yModularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishesOlivier Larouche0Miriam L. Zelditch1Richard Cloutier2Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson UniversityMuseum of Paleontology, University of MichiganLaboratoire de Recherche en Paléontologie et Biologie évolutive, Université du Québec à RimouskiAbstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential of some modules to diverge, leading to differences in disparity. Here, we investigated this relationship between modularity, rates of morphological evolution and disparity using a phylogenetically diverse sample of ray-finned fishes. We compared the support for multiple hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and asked if the partitions delimited by the best-fitting models were also characterized by the highest evolutionary rate differentials. We found that an evolutionary module incorporating the dorsal, anal and paired fins was well supported by the data, and that this module evolves more rapidly and consequently generates more disparity than other modules. This suggests that modularity may indeed promote morphological disparity through differences in evolutionary rates across modules.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Larouche
Miriam L. Zelditch
Richard Cloutier
spellingShingle Olivier Larouche
Miriam L. Zelditch
Richard Cloutier
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
Scientific Reports
author_facet Olivier Larouche
Miriam L. Zelditch
Richard Cloutier
author_sort Olivier Larouche
title Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
title_short Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
title_full Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
title_fullStr Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
title_full_unstemmed Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
title_sort modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential of some modules to diverge, leading to differences in disparity. Here, we investigated this relationship between modularity, rates of morphological evolution and disparity using a phylogenetically diverse sample of ray-finned fishes. We compared the support for multiple hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and asked if the partitions delimited by the best-fitting models were also characterized by the highest evolutionary rate differentials. We found that an evolutionary module incorporating the dorsal, anal and paired fins was well supported by the data, and that this module evolves more rapidly and consequently generates more disparity than other modules. This suggests that modularity may indeed promote morphological disparity through differences in evolutionary rates across modules.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierlarouche modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes
AT miriamlzelditch modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes
AT richardcloutier modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes
_version_ 1724391591834025984