Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes
Abstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y |
id |
doaj-ea0173e05d1a429d8b1915e48f1c6564 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea0173e05d1a429d8b1915e48f1c65642020-12-08T05:55:26ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-05-01811610.1038/s41598-018-25715-yModularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishesOlivier Larouche0Miriam L. Zelditch1Richard Cloutier2Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson UniversityMuseum of Paleontology, University of MichiganLaboratoire de Recherche en Paléontologie et Biologie évolutive, Université du Québec à RimouskiAbstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential of some modules to diverge, leading to differences in disparity. Here, we investigated this relationship between modularity, rates of morphological evolution and disparity using a phylogenetically diverse sample of ray-finned fishes. We compared the support for multiple hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and asked if the partitions delimited by the best-fitting models were also characterized by the highest evolutionary rate differentials. We found that an evolutionary module incorporating the dorsal, anal and paired fins was well supported by the data, and that this module evolves more rapidly and consequently generates more disparity than other modules. This suggests that modularity may indeed promote morphological disparity through differences in evolutionary rates across modules.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olivier Larouche Miriam L. Zelditch Richard Cloutier |
spellingShingle |
Olivier Larouche Miriam L. Zelditch Richard Cloutier Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Olivier Larouche Miriam L. Zelditch Richard Cloutier |
author_sort |
Olivier Larouche |
title |
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
title_short |
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
title_full |
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
title_fullStr |
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
title_sort |
modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Modularity is considered a prerequisite for the evolvability of biological systems. This is because in theory, individual modules can follow quasi-independent evolutionary trajectories or evolve at different rates compared to other aspects of the organism. This may influence the potential of some modules to diverge, leading to differences in disparity. Here, we investigated this relationship between modularity, rates of morphological evolution and disparity using a phylogenetically diverse sample of ray-finned fishes. We compared the support for multiple hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and asked if the partitions delimited by the best-fitting models were also characterized by the highest evolutionary rate differentials. We found that an evolutionary module incorporating the dorsal, anal and paired fins was well supported by the data, and that this module evolves more rapidly and consequently generates more disparity than other modules. This suggests that modularity may indeed promote morphological disparity through differences in evolutionary rates across modules. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25715-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olivierlarouche modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes AT miriamlzelditch modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes AT richardcloutier modularitypromotesmorphologicaldivergenceinrayfinnedfishes |
_version_ |
1724391591834025984 |