Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) during spermatogenesis has been proposed as one of the evolutionary driving forces behind both the under-representation of male-biased genes on, and the gene movement out of, the X chromosom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vibranovski Maria D, Zhang Yong E, Kemkemer Claus, Lopes Hedibert F, Karr Timothy L, Long Manyuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-06-01
Series:BMC Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/49
id doaj-ea010e1240cb452f8395d209dbfa4741
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea010e1240cb452f8395d209dbfa47412020-11-24T20:59:45ZengBMCBMC Biology1741-70072012-06-011014910.1186/1741-7007-10-49Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosomeVibranovski Maria DZhang Yong EKemkemer ClausLopes Hedibert FKarr Timothy LLong Manyuan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) during spermatogenesis has been proposed as one of the evolutionary driving forces behind both the under-representation of male-biased genes on, and the gene movement out of, the X chromosome in <it>Drosophila</it>. However, the relevance of MSCI in shaping sex chromosome evolution is controversial. Here we examine two aspects of a recent study on testis gene expression (Mikhaylova and Nurminsky, <it>BMC Biol </it>2011, <b>9:</b>29) that failed to support the MSCI in <it>Drosophila</it>. First, Mikhaylova and Nurminsky found no differences between X-linked and autosomal genes based on the transcriptional profiling of the early testis development, and thus concluded that MSCI does not occur in <it>D. melanogaster</it>. Second, they also analyzed expression data from several <it>D. melanogaster </it>tissues and concluded that under-representation on the X chromosome is not an exclusive property of testis-biased genes, but instead, a general property of tissue-specific genes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>By re-analyzing the Mikhaylova and Nurminsky's testis data and the expression data on several <it>D. melanogaster </it>tissues, we made two major findings that refuted their original claims. First, the developmental testis data has generally greater experimental error than conventional analyses, which reduced significantly the power to detect chromosomal differences in expression. Nevertheless, our re-analysis observed significantly lower expression of the X chromosome in the genomic transcriptomes of later development stages of the testis, which is consistent with the MSCI hypothesis. Second, tissue-specific genes are also in general enriched with genes more expressed in testes than in ovaries, that is testis-biased genes. By completely excluding from the analyses the testis-biased genes, which are known to be under-represented in the X, we found that all the other tissue-specific genes are randomly distributed between the X chromosome and the autosomes.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our findings negate the original study of Mikhaylova and Nurminsky, which concluded a lack of MSCI and generalized the pattern of paucity in the X chromosome for tissue-specific genes in <it>Drosophila</it>. Therefore, MSCI and other selection-based models such as sexual antagonism, dosage compensation, and meiotic-drive continue to be viable models as driving forces shaping the genomic distribution of male-related genes in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/49
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vibranovski Maria D
Zhang Yong E
Kemkemer Claus
Lopes Hedibert F
Karr Timothy L
Long Manyuan
spellingShingle Vibranovski Maria D
Zhang Yong E
Kemkemer Claus
Lopes Hedibert F
Karr Timothy L
Long Manyuan
Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
BMC Biology
author_facet Vibranovski Maria D
Zhang Yong E
Kemkemer Claus
Lopes Hedibert F
Karr Timothy L
Long Manyuan
author_sort Vibranovski Maria D
title Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
title_short Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
title_full Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
title_fullStr Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
title_full_unstemmed Re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila X chromosome
title_sort re-analysis of the larval testis data on meiotic sex chromosome inactivation revealed evidence for tissue-specific gene expression related to the drosophila x chromosome
publisher BMC
series BMC Biology
issn 1741-7007
publishDate 2012-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) during spermatogenesis has been proposed as one of the evolutionary driving forces behind both the under-representation of male-biased genes on, and the gene movement out of, the X chromosome in <it>Drosophila</it>. However, the relevance of MSCI in shaping sex chromosome evolution is controversial. Here we examine two aspects of a recent study on testis gene expression (Mikhaylova and Nurminsky, <it>BMC Biol </it>2011, <b>9:</b>29) that failed to support the MSCI in <it>Drosophila</it>. First, Mikhaylova and Nurminsky found no differences between X-linked and autosomal genes based on the transcriptional profiling of the early testis development, and thus concluded that MSCI does not occur in <it>D. melanogaster</it>. Second, they also analyzed expression data from several <it>D. melanogaster </it>tissues and concluded that under-representation on the X chromosome is not an exclusive property of testis-biased genes, but instead, a general property of tissue-specific genes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>By re-analyzing the Mikhaylova and Nurminsky's testis data and the expression data on several <it>D. melanogaster </it>tissues, we made two major findings that refuted their original claims. First, the developmental testis data has generally greater experimental error than conventional analyses, which reduced significantly the power to detect chromosomal differences in expression. Nevertheless, our re-analysis observed significantly lower expression of the X chromosome in the genomic transcriptomes of later development stages of the testis, which is consistent with the MSCI hypothesis. Second, tissue-specific genes are also in general enriched with genes more expressed in testes than in ovaries, that is testis-biased genes. By completely excluding from the analyses the testis-biased genes, which are known to be under-represented in the X, we found that all the other tissue-specific genes are randomly distributed between the X chromosome and the autosomes.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our findings negate the original study of Mikhaylova and Nurminsky, which concluded a lack of MSCI and generalized the pattern of paucity in the X chromosome for tissue-specific genes in <it>Drosophila</it>. Therefore, MSCI and other selection-based models such as sexual antagonism, dosage compensation, and meiotic-drive continue to be viable models as driving forces shaping the genomic distribution of male-related genes in <it>Drosophila</it>.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/49
work_keys_str_mv AT vibranovskimariad reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
AT zhangyonge reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
AT kemkemerclaus reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
AT lopeshedibertf reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
AT karrtimothyl reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
AT longmanyuan reanalysisofthelarvaltestisdataonmeioticsexchromosomeinactivationrevealedevidencefortissuespecificgeneexpressionrelatedtothedrosophilaxchromosome
_version_ 1716781650828853248