Musical Platonism in Modern Culture

Not too long ago, the Atlantic Monthly, one of the better-known organs of modern culture and thinking about it, ran a commentary on music in contemporary society by the art critic Jody Bottum. The main objective of “The Soundtracking of America” (March 2000) is to topple music from its present-day...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Edmund J. Goehring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2003-03-01
Series:Current Musicology
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/currentmusicology/article/view/4945
id doaj-e9fd21caa2624cb1870172a58c33ff7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9fd21caa2624cb1870172a58c33ff7b2020-11-25T04:01:28ZengColumbia University LibrariesCurrent Musicology0011-37352003-03-017510.7916/cm.v0i75.4945Musical Platonism in Modern CultureEdmund J. Goehring Not too long ago, the Atlantic Monthly, one of the better-known organs of modern culture and thinking about it, ran a commentary on music in contemporary society by the art critic Jody Bottum. The main objective of “The Soundtracking of America” (March 2000) is to topple music from its present-day position of cultural supremacy. Bottum contends that music does not deserve its place of superiority over the poetic arts, in particular, because it is intellectually barren. Incapable of generating meaning without help from elsewhere, music must latch on to an external, largely verbal system of beliefs for it to have coherence or utility. Without such moorings, music becomes a destabilizing force in society. The desire to restore music to its old subservience to poetry, a position it has not held for some two centuries, resonates strongly in many circles of contemporary social/political thought, including academic ones. Not only are Bottum’s concerns related to ongoing questions about music’s place among the other arts; more broadly, they draw on a larger academic debate about the ability of any individual discipline, not just music, to generate its own meaning. The purpose of the present essay is to examine the sources and implications of this modern effort to explain music through external, non-musical standards. First, it will excavate the philosophical roots of this anti-musical prejudice. Here, the argument will be that the move to circumscribe music within the ambit of the verbal arts or a philosophical system turns on a specific reading-or, more likely, a misreading- of Platonic thought. Approaching music in this way leads both to errors about the general nature of music and also to misinterpretations of specific works. Second, this essay will suggest that there are other, more compelling ways of conceiving music, including ones that grant music autonomy from external standards without a loss of intelligibility or meaningfulness. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/currentmusicology/article/view/4945
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edmund J. Goehring
spellingShingle Edmund J. Goehring
Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
Current Musicology
author_facet Edmund J. Goehring
author_sort Edmund J. Goehring
title Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
title_short Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
title_full Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
title_fullStr Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
title_full_unstemmed Musical Platonism in Modern Culture
title_sort musical platonism in modern culture
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Current Musicology
issn 0011-3735
publishDate 2003-03-01
description Not too long ago, the Atlantic Monthly, one of the better-known organs of modern culture and thinking about it, ran a commentary on music in contemporary society by the art critic Jody Bottum. The main objective of “The Soundtracking of America” (March 2000) is to topple music from its present-day position of cultural supremacy. Bottum contends that music does not deserve its place of superiority over the poetic arts, in particular, because it is intellectually barren. Incapable of generating meaning without help from elsewhere, music must latch on to an external, largely verbal system of beliefs for it to have coherence or utility. Without such moorings, music becomes a destabilizing force in society. The desire to restore music to its old subservience to poetry, a position it has not held for some two centuries, resonates strongly in many circles of contemporary social/political thought, including academic ones. Not only are Bottum’s concerns related to ongoing questions about music’s place among the other arts; more broadly, they draw on a larger academic debate about the ability of any individual discipline, not just music, to generate its own meaning. The purpose of the present essay is to examine the sources and implications of this modern effort to explain music through external, non-musical standards. First, it will excavate the philosophical roots of this anti-musical prejudice. Here, the argument will be that the move to circumscribe music within the ambit of the verbal arts or a philosophical system turns on a specific reading-or, more likely, a misreading- of Platonic thought. Approaching music in this way leads both to errors about the general nature of music and also to misinterpretations of specific works. Second, this essay will suggest that there are other, more compelling ways of conceiving music, including ones that grant music autonomy from external standards without a loss of intelligibility or meaningfulness.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/currentmusicology/article/view/4945
work_keys_str_mv AT edmundjgoehring musicalplatonisminmodernculture
_version_ 1724446860709462016